Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Standard Radiators Pvt. ... on 18 March, 2014

Author: Akil Kureshi

Bench: Akil Kureshi, Sonia Gokani

        O/TAXAP/792/2006                               ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                       TAX APPEAL NO. 792 of 2006

================================================================
        JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX....Appellant(s)
                           Versus
          STANDARD RADIATORS PVT. LTD....Opponent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR KM PARIKH, ADVOCATE for the Appellant.
MR MANISH J SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent.
================================================================

      CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL
             KURESHI
             and
             HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA
             GOKANI

                            Date : 18/03/2014


                             ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)

1. The appeal was admitted for consideration of the  following substantial question of law :

"Whether   on   the   facts   and   circumstances   of  the case and in law, ITAT was right in law   in   holding   that   sums   ratable   to   sales   tax   and   excise   duty   do   not   form   part   of   total   turn   over   for   the   purpose   of   computing   profits   derived   from   export   for   claiming   benefit   u/s.80hhc   of   the   income   tax   act,   1961 ?"
Page 1 of 2
O/TAXAP/792/2006 ORDER
2. Counsel for the respondent pointed out that the  sole question arising in this appeal is covered  by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case  of  CIT   v.   Lakshmi   Machine   Works,   reported   in   (2007)   290   ITR   667   (S.C.).  The decision of the  Tribunal,   which   has   held   otherwise,   must   be  reversed to that extent.
3. Resultantly,   the   Tax   Appeal   is   allowed.   The  judgment of the Tribunal to the above extent is  reversed.   Tax   Appeal   stands   disposed   of.   There  shall be, however, no order as to costs.

(AKIL KURESHI, J.) (MS SONIA GOKANI, J.) Aakar Page 2 of 2