Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Telangana High Court

Korvi Krishna vs The State Of Teldngana on 27 June, 2023

Author: Chillakur Sumalatha

Bench: Chillakur Sumalatha

     HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

                WRIT PETITION No.16194 of 2023

ORDER:

1. Heard Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri B.Dilip Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration, who is representing Respondent Nos.1 to 6.

2. This Writ Petition is filed seeking the Court to issue an order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of Respondent No.6 i.e., Tahsildar-cum-Joint Registrar, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in entertaining the registration process of the land of the petitioners i.e., the land to an extent of Ac.1.20 guntas, situated in Sy.No.244/23 of Pedda Amberpet Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, basing on the Gazette Notification dated 26.09.2013, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the said Public Authority to entertain the registration process.

3. Making his submission, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the lawful owners and possessors of the subject land and due to their 2 Dr.CSL,J W.P.No.16194 _2023 necessities, they intended to sell the land and the petitioners have presented the sale deeds for registration, but the 6th respondent failed to accept the sale deeds on the ground that the land is prohibited for registration as per the Gazette Notification dated 26.09.2013. Learned counsel submits that the said Gazette Notification does not mean that the land in question is prohibited for registration and this Court, in umpteen number of cases, had directed the Registering Authority to proceed with the registration and complete the process and therefore, similar orders may be issued.

4. In this regard, learned counsel referred to the decisions of this Court in W.P.No.26288 of 2019, dated 28.11.2019, W.P.No.2886 of 2020, dated 24.02.2020, W.P.No.11240 of 2020, dated 28.07.2020, W.P.No.10039 of 2020, dated 10.07.2020, W.P.No.6388 of 2020, dated 25.06.2020 and W.P.No.4358 of 2020, dated 28.02.2020.

5. Per contra, the submission of learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration is that the petitioners are not the lawful owners of the subject land and further, as per the Gazette notification, the property falls in 3 Dr.CSL,J W.P.No.16194 _2023 the prohibitory list and therefore, the Registering Authority rightly refused to entertain the said Sale Deeds and register the same.

6. In reply to the said submission, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on thorough verification, Pattadar Pass Book was issued in favour of the petitioners with regard to the subject land duly mentioning that the petitioners are the pattadars of the said land. Learned counsel also states that the Gazette Notification is invalid in the eye of law. The Gazette Notification is the one which is issued through Proc.No.E5/4976/2013/HAYATHNAGAR/Pedda Amberpet, dated 26.09.2013. The opening sentences of the said notification reads as under:-

"In exercise of the powers conferred under G.O.Ms.No.863 Rev (Reg.I) Dept., dated 20.6.2007 and CCLA's circular Instructions No.B1/385/2012, dated 29.05.2013, the following lands are notified under Section 22-A(1)(a) for the purpose of Section 22-A(1). Notice is hereby given inviting objections and suggestions on the above proposal from all persons who are likely to be affected thereby for being taken into consideration by the Government. All objections and suggestions should be in writing in English or in Telugu 4 Dr.CSL,J W.P.No.16194 _2023 and should be addressed to the Collector (By designation) of Ranga Reddy District within whose jurisdiction the area lies, so as to reach the office of Collector, Ranga Reddy District, on or before the expiry of thirty days from the date of publication of this notification in the Andhra Pradesh Gazzette."

7. Thus, by the aforementioned averments in the Notification, it is clear that objections and suggestions were called for with regard to notifying the subject land in the prohibitory list. Therefore, as rightly contended, the said Notification prima facie cannot be termed to be a prohibitory order. Further, this Court in the orders rendered in W.P.No.26288 of 2019, dated 28.11.2009, dealing with the same notification, however in respect of a different village, at Paras 8 to 12 of the order, held as follows:-

"8. The only issue for consideration in this Writ Petition is whether the notification issued by the District Collector amounts to prohibition of registration of lands mentioned therein concerning Survey Nos.77 to 80 of Hafeezpet Village in purported exercise of power under Section 22(A)(1)(e) of the Act.

9. Learned Advocate General submits that the notification in question is not issued under the above said provision and that it is erroneously mentioned and 5 Dr.CSL,J W.P.No.16194 _2023 that the power is vested to issue a notification only in the State Government under Section 22(A)(2) of the Act. Further, the State Government is entitled to call for the report from the District Collector and the notification issued on 26.09.2013 is for the purpose of compiling the information and submitting a report to the State Government to enable it to issue a notification under Section 22(A)(2) of the Act.

10. In other words, learned Advocate General fairly submits that there is no notification issued as on today under Section 22(A)(2) of the Act. It is further submitted that only after receipt of report from the District Collector and after examining the same by the State Government, appropriate action as warranted by law more particularly under Section 22(A)(2) of the Act would be taken.

11. In view of the submission of learned Advocate General, it is made clear that notification dated 26.09.2013 is not a notification under Section 22(A)(2) of the Act and since, as on today, there is no such notification issued under Section 22(A)(2) of the Act, there is no restraint on the registering authority to receive and process the deeds of conveyance concerning the lands in Survey Nos.79 to 80 of Hafeezpet Village.

12. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar to receive and process the deeds of 6 Dr.CSL,J W.P.No.16194 _2023 conveyance without reference to the District Gazette notification dated 26.09.2013 in accordance with the Indian Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. However, it is open for the registering authority to refuse to register the deeds presented before him, if he has any other objection, by duly assigning reasons in support of such decision and communicate the decision to the petitioners. It is made clear that mere registration of deed of conveyance does not confer title to the property and it is made clear that this order does not preclude the Government to take appropriate steps as warranted by law and to assert its title. No costs."

8. Thus, in the light of the aforementioned facts, this Court is of the view that the petitioners are justified in seeking for a direction to the Public Authority to perform its duty.

9. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is allowed.

Registering Authority is directed to receive and register the documents produced by the petitioners in respect of land to an extent of Ac.1.20 guntas, situated in Sy.No.244/23 of Pedda Amberpet Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, subject to the verification of the nature of the land and 7 Dr.CSL,J W.P.No.16194 _2023 supporting documents to be submitted by the petitioners with regard to their capacity to sell the land without reference to District Gazette Notification dated 26.09.2013, in case the said documents are in compliance with the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. In case it is found that the said documents are not admissible for registration, necessary orders in that regard shall be passed and the objections shall be communicated to the petitioners in writing. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA Date:27.06.2023 ysk 8 Dr.CSL,J W.P.No.16194 _2023 HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION No.16194 of 2023 Date:27.06.2023 ysk