Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

M/S Hcc-Dsd-Vnr Consortium vs Northeast Frontier Railway And 2 Ors on 27 February, 2026

Author: Soumitra Saikia

Bench: Soumitra Saikia

                                                                          Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010108622025




                                                                   undefined

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                  Case No. : Arb.P./20/2025

            M/S HCC-DSD-VNR CONSORTIUM
            CONSORTIUM OF HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (HCC), M/S
            DSD BRUNCKENBAU GMBH (DSD) AND VNR INFRASTRUCTURES
            LIMITED HAVING ITS OFFICE SITUATED AT HINCON HOUSE, LBS MARG,
            VIKHROLI, (WEST) MUMBAI, 400083 AND IS REPRESENTED BY PROJECT
            MANAGER, BOGIBEEL RAIL-CUM-ROAD BRIDGE PROJECT, NAMELY SHRI
            RAKESH KUMAR SINGH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O SHRI RANG
            BAHADUR SINGH, R/O C-504, LOKHRA SUBHAM GREEN, GUWAHATI-
            781034



            VERSUS

            NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY AND 2 ORS.
            REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, (CONSTRUCTION), NORTH-
            EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GUWAHATI- 11

            2:THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (CONSTRUCTION)
             NORTH-EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
             MALIGAON
             GUWAHATI- 11.

            3:THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER
             CONSTRUCTION/TUNNEL
             NORTH-EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
             MALIGAON
             GUWAHATI- 11

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. A K SAHEWALLA, MR P GOGOI,MR. W SHARMA

Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR H GUPTA (C.G.C),MR G GOSWAMI,ASSTT.S.G.I.
                                                                       Page No.# 2/3


                                BEFORE
                 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

                                     ORDER

27.02.2026 Heard Mr. J. Roy learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. A. K. Sahewalla, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also Heard Mr. G. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, Railway, Mr. H. Gupta, learned CGC for the Respondents.

2. In deference to the earlier order dated 27.01.2026, the prospective arbitrators appointed on behalf of the parties, namely Hon'ble Mr. Justice E. Padmanabhan, Former Judge of the Madras High Court, as the "Arbitrator" for the claimants, while Mr. H. K. Jaggi, Former General Manager, Indian Railways as the "nominee arbitrator" for the Railways have submitted their written declaration as is required under Section 12(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, they have expressed no difficulty, hardship or handicap in being appointed as the Arbitrators.

3. In view of the written declaration dated 27.01.2026 received by the Registry, the appointment of Hon'ble Mr. Justice E. Padmanabhan, Former Judge of Madras High Court and Mr. H. K. Jaggi, Former General Manager, Indian Railways as "Arbitrators" for the claimant and the "Nominee arbitrator" for the Indian Railways respectively is hereby confirmed.

4. The two arbitrators will now proceed to appoint Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy, Former Judge of the Supreme Court of India as the "Presiding Arbitrator"

as have already been ordered by an order of this Court dated 27.01.2026.

5. In the order dated 27.01.2026 a written declaration was directed to be furnished under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The same stands corrected. The written declaration is required to be furnished under Page No.# 3/3 Section 12(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliations Act, 1996.

6. The Arbitrator so appointed will now proceed with the Tribunal so constituted.

7. Accordingly, this Arbitration Petition is disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant