Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Jeevanjyot Kaur Bansal vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 7 June, 2022

Author: Revati Mohite Dere

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere

          Digitally signed
                                                                     1. WP 6336-2021 @ 4044-2021.doc
          by RUPALI
          RAJESH
RUPALI    WAKODIKAR
RAJESH    Date:
WAKODIKAR 2022.06.09
          17:26:11
          +0530

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                   CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 6336 OF 2021
                         Jeevanjyot Kaur Bansal                             ...Petitioner
                              Versus
                         The State of Maharashtra and Ors.                  ...Respondents

                                               ALONGWITH
                                   CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4044 OF 2021
                         Jeevanjyot Kaur Bansal                             ...Petitioner
                              Versus
                         Kulvinder Singh Bansal and Anr.                    ...Respondents

                         Mr.Shantanu Phanse i/b Akram Kapoor for the Petitioner in           both the
                         petitions.

                         Ms. Pallavi Singh i/b Ms. Saveena T. Bedi and Lawhive Associates for the
                         Respondent No.1 in WP/4044/2021 and for the Respondent No.2 in
                         WP/6336/2021.

                         Mrs. P.P.Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.

                                                  CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 7th JUNE, 2022 P.C. :

1. A praecipe has been circulated for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 22nd March, 2022.
2. Learned Counsel for the respondent/husband states that a common order was passed by this Court in the aforesaid writ petitions. She Wakodikar 1/2
1. WP 6336-2021 @ 4044-2021.doc submits that the Sessions Court, Dindoshi, vide order dated 10 th November, 2021 had directed the respondent/husband to pay Rs.60,000/- per month to the petitioner herein and Rs.60,000/- per month to the petitioner's daughter (totaling Rs.1,20,000/- per month). However, para 11 of the order dated 22nd March, 2022 reads thus;
"11. In the meantime, the respondent No.2 to continue to comply with the interim order passed by the learned Sessions Court i.e. of payment of Rs.1,20,000/- per month to the petitioner."

3. Accordingly, para 11 is clarified to read as under ;

"11. In the meantime, the respondent No.2 to continue to comply with the interim order passed by the learned Sessions Court i.e. Rs.60,000/- per month to the petitioner herein and Rs.60,000/- per month to the petitioner's daughter (totaling Rs.1,20,000/- per month)."

4. Order dated 22nd March, 2022 be corrected in the above terms.

5. Rest of the order dated 22nd March, 2022 to remain as it is.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Wakodikar 2/2