Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Arun Gurung @ Babu vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home ... on 7 June, 2021

Author: Rajeev Singh

Bench: Rajeev Singh





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 17
 

 
Case :- U/S 482/378/407 No. - 2001 of 2021
 

 
Applicant :- Arun Gurung @ Babu
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow And Anr.
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Singh Parihar
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
 

The Court convened through video conferencing.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to direct the concerned Court/Magistrate, Lucknow not to insist the applicant to file separate surety bonds in each and every cases and accept only one surety in lieu of all the thirteen cases.

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in thirteen cases, details of which are as under:

1. F.I.R. No. 216 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Chinhat, District Lucknow
2. F.I.R. No. 238 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Chinhat, District Lucknow
3. F.I.R. No. 240 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Chinhat, District Lucknow
4. F.I.R. No. 546 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380 I.P.C., P.S. Chinhat, District Lucknow
5. F.I.R. No. 587 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Chinhat, District Lucknow
6. F.I.R. No. 601 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Chinhat, District Lucknow
7. F.I.R. No. 617 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Chinhat, District Lucknow
8. F.I.R. No. 516 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Mandion, District Lucknow
9. F.I.R. No. 569 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380 I.P.C., P.S. Mandion, District Lucknow
10. F.I.R. No. 659 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., P.S. P.G.I., District Lucknow
11. F.I.R. No. 233 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Vibhuti Khand, District Lucknow
12. F.I.R. No. 305 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380, 411 I.P.C., P.S. Indira Nagar, District Lucknow
13. F.I.R. No. 22 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380 I.P.C., P.S. Gajipur, District Lucknow It has been submitted that the applicant has been granted bail by the court below in all the cases, but furnishing of twenty six sureties in thirteen different cases is almost impracticable as the applicant is very poor person and he will not be able to arrange 26 sureties to get bail.

Learned counsel for the applicant has also relied the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran@ Vikky Vs. The State of Uttar Praesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018).

Considering the aforesaid fact, this application is disposed of with the direction that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond and two sureties in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail order has been passed.

With the above direction, the application is finally disposed of.

The party shall file computer generated copy of order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by it alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said person(s) (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number(s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked, before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of the computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

Order Date :- 7.6.2021 VKS