Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Basappa S/O Mudakappa Goraguddi vs Sri. Mallikarjun Heggannavar on 9 September, 2025

Author: S.Sunil Dutt Yadav

Bench: S.Sunil Dutt Yadav

                                                 -1-
                                                       NC: 2025:KHC-D:11584-DB
                                                        CCC No. 100390 of 2024


                    HC-KAR




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
                    DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025
                                    PRESENT
                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
                                           AND
                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
                        CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100390 OF 2024
                   BETWEEN:
                   1.    SRI. BASAPPA S/O MUDAKAPPA GORAGUDDI
                         AGE 91 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
                         R/O MALLUR VILLAGE, TQ. SAUNDATTI,
                         DISTRICT BELAGAVI 591123.

                   2.    SRI. HANAMANT S/O MUDAKAPPA GORAGUDDI
                         AGE 32 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
                         R/O MALLUR VILLAGE, TQ. SAUNDATTI,
                         DISTRICT BELAGAVI 591123.

                   3.   SRI. SHIVAPPA S/O MUDAKAPPA GORAGUDDI
                        AGE 29 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE,
                        R/O MALLUR VILLAGE, TQ. SAUNDATTI,
                        DISTRICT BELAGAVI 591123.
                                                      -    COMPLAINANTS
                   (BY SRI. H.M. DHARIGOND, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by VINAYAKA B
V
Location: High     AND:
Court of
Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench
                   1.    SRI. MALLIKARJUN HEGGANNAVAR
                         THE TAHASILDAR SAUNDATTI TALUK,
                         SAUNDATTI DISTRICT BELAGAVI 591123.
                                                        -    ACCUSED
                   2.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                         ITS REPRESENTED BY AGA,
                         DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD.
                                               - PROFORMA RESPONDENT

                   (BY SRI. PRAVEEN UPPAR, AGA FOR A1 & PROFORMA RESPONDENT)
                                   -2-
                                           NC: 2025:KHC-D:11584-DB
                                           CCC No. 100390 of 2024


HC-KAR



      THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1950, PRAYING TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED
FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDER DATED 22.11.2023 PASSED IN
W.P. NO. 106866/2023 PASSED BY THIS COURT VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN
THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC.

     THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS
MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
            AND
            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL

                             ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) The present contempt petition has been filed asserting disobedience of the direction passed in W.P. No. 106866/2023. In the aforementioned writ petition, which is disposed of as per order dated 22.11.2023, direction at paragraph No. 5 reads as follows:

"5. This being the position, this court is of the view that Tahasildar, Saundatti shall take appropriate measures in terms of the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner marked at Annexure-H and proceed further as contemplated in law."

2. Learned Additional Government Advocate has filed an affidavit and submits that the order of the Assistant -3- NC: 2025:KHC-D:11584-DB CCC No. 100390 of 2024 HC-KAR Commissioner dated 03.06.2022 was a direction for re- building of file. It is submitted that steps have been taken and records have been placed before the 'Missing File Committee' on 29.05.2024 and steps have been taken as per law.

3. In the light of the above and accepting the steps taken, it can be said that there is no willful disobedience of the order. Accordingly, proceedings are dropped.

Needless to state that the steps to be taken by the respondents should reach logical finality, without unnecessary procrastination.

Sd/-

(S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE Sd/-

(VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE BVV, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 14