Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Vishwa Nath Tulasi vs Union Of India And Ors on 25 February, 2019

Bench: Ajay Kumar Mittal, Manjari Nehru Kaul

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                         AT CHANDIGARH


103                              Civil Writ Petition No.26851 of 2018
                                 Date of decision: February 25, 2019


Vishwa Nath Tulasi                                          ....Petitioner

                   versus

Union of India and others                                   ....Respondents

CORAM:       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
             HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

                                 *****

Present:     Mr. Abhilaksh Grover, Advocate for the petitioner.

             Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr. Standing Counsel
             for the respondent-Revenue.

                                 *****

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)

The prayer made in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 (for short, 'the Cr.P.C.'), is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the complaint No.197/2018 dated 28.03.2018 (Annexure P-3) and subsequent prosecution initiated against the petitioner under Section 277 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Sections 50 and 51 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015, without considering that absolutely no offence(s) as alleged in the said complaint have been made out against him and that any continuation of proceedings in the present case are purely intended to harass and cause unnecessary hardship to him especially given the fact that the foreign assets so alleged are no longer in existence and that he has never derived any financial benefit from the same. Further prayer has also been made to quash 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 17-03-2019 14:52:57 ::: Civil Writ Petition No.26851 of 2018 -2-

-------

the sanction order dated 16.01.2018 (Annexure P-2) and the show cause notice dated 08.11.2017 (Annexure P-1) issued by respondent No.4.

2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has instructions to withdraw the present writ petition as the petitioner wishes to file a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. instead of writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the complaint and sanction for prosecution.

3. Dismissed as withdrawn.

4. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to him, in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE February 25, 2019 sonia gugnani Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 17-03-2019 14:52:57 :::