Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mrkrishna Devi vs Gnctd on 19 April, 2016

                  CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                     (Room No.315, B­Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066)



                    Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar)

                                            Information Commissioner



                                            CIC/SA/A/2016/000142


                        Krishna Devi v. PIO, Directorate of Vigilance

                                            Important Dates and time taken:




     RTI: 30.07.2015                 Reply: 17.08.2015                        FAO: 29.09.2015

     SA: 05.01.2016                  Hearing: 19.04.2016                      Decided on : 19.04.2016

     Result:  Disposed of with direction.




Parties Present:


1.      Appellant is represented by Mr. O. P. Dabas. Mr. Parmod Kumar, Asstt. Director (Vig) 

represents Public authority.


FACTS:

2. The appellant sought information pertaining to action taken report on complaint dated  28.5.2013   pursuant   to   which   enquiry   was   conducted.   The   CPIO   said   that   disciplinary  proceedings   have   been   initiated   against   Mr.   MP   Kushwaha   which   cannot   be   provided   as  investigation is under progress. The FAA directed PIO to provide information after severing  information   which   cannot   be   provided.   The   appellant   filed   second   appeal   before   this  Commission. 

Decision :

3. The appellant has complaint against Mr. M. P. Kushwaha, former Sub Registrar Pritam  Pura alleging that he has disposed of the properties of the appellant by registering unsigned  documents. She sought action taken report on the complaints against Mr. M. P. Kushwaha. 

The CPIO of Directorate of Vigilance stated that the charge sheet has been issued to him for  initiating  disciplinary proceedings,  his  explanation  is  under  consideration.  The Commission  directs the Directorate of Vigilance to provide certified copy of charge sheet to the appellant  before 26.04.2016.

(M. Sridhar Acharyulu) Information Commissioner  Authenticated true copy (Babu Lal) Deputy Registrar Copy of decision given to the parties free of cost. Addresses of the parties:

1. The CPIO under RTI, Directorate of Vigilance, 4th Level, C­Wing, Delhi Secretariat, IP Estate, New Delhi.
2. Ms. Krishna Devi, D/o Sh. Rajinder Singh, DP 245, Maurya Enclave, Pitam Pura, Delhi­110034.