Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M Ramesh S/O Pothu Raja Reddy vs P Bala Kistayya S/O Balaiah on 22 June, 2010

Bench: K.Sreedhar Rao, K.Govindarajulu

I

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2Q'ID;'.L:I.%

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE**K;sREAEDIIARNAG 

AND 

THE HON'BLE MR.JUsTI.c;E K}GOI.IINI:AEAI_IIIL3U I

MFA No. 1256501? 2.QO7.(l»'{VjV'_'A 

BETWEEN  I  I

53/0 POTHU_RAJA RE_DDY..'    A 

AGED 35   ~.      .

occ:sALEs E}{ECUTIV*E~A,  :

INDIA LTD.;»_  Vk   'L 

R/O.RAIIC'H£}R_V      APPELLANT
[BY SI:€VI'.--SI"IIVAI(:vIJI[1V'j.~\I3Z"~I$:'{AIILOOR, ADV.)

 *  I.  BALAAKISTAYTA.

 A : A.I3;

A  IS/AOIBALAIAH»
"  AGED 5-9I~¥.EARS,
. '-DRIVER OF MINI BUS,
I .._4R/O~.N_Q.; 1- I--sAII3ABA COLONY,

SHADNAGAR.
_DT_I\_/1'-EHABOOBNAGAR.

 '"G'.T.N. TEXTILES LTD

I GUDNLAPOTLAPALY VILLAGE.
BALANGAR MANDLAM DISTRICT.

MAHABOOBNAGAR.
REPBY P.V.RAMASI-IARAM,

MAJORC/O.NO.1--1,
SAIBABA COLONY.



MAJOR,C/O.NO.1~1,
SAIBABA COLONY.
SHADNAGAR,
DT.I\/IEHABOOBNAGAR,
AP.

3. THE BRANCH MANAGER
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.,
MEHABOOBNAGAR,

AP.     A

(BY SRLSHIVANAND PATIL EORRI Ri,~'_3} 3 A

THIS MFA FILED"RV__U~,/S ACT}

AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT: AND  DATED
28.05.2007 PASSE];):1'N. MVCR:.No.,_35,*.2006 DNR THE FILE
OF MEMBER, MAC'?  "F{I%;E';'SI1.3:_I1'«i(.:3I,'R'_OFFICER, FAST
TRACK COURfI"-«III, IIAIZCI«:i_Ugg]IéArITLfALLOWING THE
CLAIM b'~ojI§1L3.oMPE;Ns.ATiON AND SEEKINC

ENHANC APTQFELC'-QIx€[PENSATION.

TH'IeS_VAPi5EAI..-_v  ON FOR HEARING THIS
DAT}  SREEDHAR: RAO J., DELIVERED THE

.   ..... _.

JUDGMENT

pt '1"Vlra1e.'4'éVIppe11aiTt / petitioner sustained fracture of spine injury 01 to C~7, thorax region in a inotor vehicle accident. The petitioner is operated thrice. V.m;I'he Doctor has assessed total body disability @ 25%. The petitioner is a Sales Executive. The petitioner on account of disability Cannot undertake journey. The + 3 petitioner is in employment with no-security of service of tenure. The Income of the appellant is Rs.12";8pOO/-- per month. Therefore, the petitioner compensation under the head loss of future incoirie"

account of disability. Incomeifffioss disability is 20% i.e., Rs.2,E36_0/--."---prV--

2. The occurrence of---ace-ident, negligence of the driver of the offendingVehic]e:':'»and:coverage of insurance is not in dispute_ The tfhefollovving sums:

Towards"1os's on : Rs.4,6o,8o0/-- account of disability ,. R (2560_ X 12' x '1 5;;-aulutipiier) pain and"agony : Rs. 50,000/~-- 'T future amenities : Rs. 15,000/-- and incidental : Rs.2,00,000/-- exp"'enses'"
To*Jaras loss of income towards : Rs. 20,000/~ " _iai_cl_jup period Total : Rs. 7,-45,800/--
% In all, the petitioner is entitled for a Rs.7,45,800/-- as against Rs.2,24,ooo/-. . compensation shall carry 6% p.a_._ ..i.n,terest.Vfrdnii;Vttié it of petition till the date of payment.' ' Jqg "