Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Gundappa Jagannath Hulgeri vs The State Of Maharashtra on 14 January, 2020

Author: Prakash D. Naik

Bench: Prakash D. Naik

 Sajakali Jamadar                      1 of 4                     904-BA-1604-2019.doc




               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                    CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1604 OF 2019
 Gundappa Jagannath Hulgeri                              ...Applicant
       Versus
 The State of Maharashtra                                ...Respondent

                                      WITH
                     INTERVENTION APPLICATION NO. 01 OF 2020
                                        IN
                    CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1604 OF 2019
 Prakash Bhalchandra Waikar                              ...Applicant
       Versus
 The State of Maharashtra                                ...Respondent


                                  .....
 Mr. Sagar Tambe i/b Mr. Ritesh Thobde, Advocate for the Applicant.
 Mr. M. R. Deshpande, Advocate for Original Complainant.
 Smt. Veera Shinde, APP for the state-respondent.
                                  .....

                                CORAM :     PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
                                DATE :      14th January, 2020

 PC :

 1.        This is an application for bail in C.R. No. 628 of 2018

 registered with Fauzdar Chavadi Police Station, Dist. Solapur for

 offence punishable under Sections 420, 409, 403, 408 of IPC and

 Sections 66, 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) of Information Technology Act.


 2.        The prosecution case is that, during the period from 2 nd March,

 2018 to 13th August, 2018, the applicant while working as a clerk in

 the computer department of Solapur Janta Sahakari bank Ltd.




::: Uploaded on - 16/01/2020                    ::: Downloaded on - 16/01/2020 21:15:08 :::
  Sajakali Jamadar                    2 of 4                      904-BA-1604-2019.doc




 operated frozen accounts of three persons by obtaining supervisory

 password and transferred the amount in those account to the

 applicant and witnesses Ambadas Dandi and Mallinath Kanche. The

 accused had threatened the complainant and cheated the bank to the

 tune of Rs.21,92,000/-


 3.        Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant

 is in custody for more than one year. The trial has not commenced.

 There are no criminal antecedents against him. Amount of Rs. 3 Lakh

 was seized from the bank account of the applicant during the course

 of investigation. It is further submitted that the applicant has filed

 affidavit dated 16th December, 2019, stating that after he is released

 on bail he will make an earnest endeavor to sell the plot purchased

 by him which is situated at Gat No. 3, Survey No. 164/1/A/1/1, plot

 No.13 admeasuring 111.29 Sq. Meters and deposit the amount out of

 the sale proceeds in the registry of District and Sessions Court

 Solapur. The trial Court after conclusion of trial may make just and

 equitable decision of said amount. The amount would be deposited

 to show his bonafide.


 4.        Learned APP submitted that the value of the property,

 applicant intends to sell is lesser than the amount misappropriated

 by the applicant. It is further submitted that there is no guarantee




::: Uploaded on - 16/01/2020                   ::: Downloaded on - 16/01/2020 21:15:08 :::
  Sajakali Jamadar                        3 of 4                      904-BA-1604-2019.doc




 that the applicant would sell the property.


 5.        Learned counsel for the intervenor reiterated the submissions

 advanced by learned APP. It is submitted that the accused have

 misappropriated the amount by misusing the password. He might

 tamper with the evidence if referred on bail. It is further submitted

 that the amount which will be received out of the sale proceeds may

 be directed to be deposited with the complainant bank.


 6.        The applicant is arrested on 18 th October, 2018, since then he

 is in custody. Since the applicant has filed affidavit/undertaking to

 show his bonafide, opportunity can be given to him by granting

 temporary bail. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that

 the property mentioned in the affidavit will be sold within a period

 of 8 weeks and the sale proceeds would be deposited in the trial

 Court. Considering the submissions, presently the bail can be granted

 to the applicant for temporary period of two months from the date of

 his release.


 6.        Hence, I pass the following order.


                                          ORDER

i) The applicant is directed to be released on bail in connection with C.R. No. 628 of 2018 registered ::: Uploaded on - 16/01/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 16/01/2020 21:15:08 ::: Sajakali Jamadar 4 of 4 904-BA-1604-2019.doc with Fauzdar Chavadi Police Station, Dist. Solapur for a period of two months from the date of his release on furnishing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount;

ii) The applicant shall abide by the statements in the affidavit dated 16th December, 2019 and the amount out of the sale proceeds presently be deposited in the Trial Court.

iii) The applicant shall report concerned police station once in a fortnight on 2nd Saturday between 10.00 am. to 12.00 pm. till further order. The applicant shall remain present in this Court on next date of hearing.

iv) Stand over to 11th March, 2020.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) ::: Uploaded on - 16/01/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 16/01/2020 21:15:08 :::