Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Desiya Murpokku Dravida Munnetra ... vs Union Of India on 10 March, 2015

Author: M. M. Sundresh

Bench: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, M.M.Sundresh

       

  

   

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

			Dated: 10..03..2015

Coram:

The Honourable Mr.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE
and
The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH

W.P.No.9730 of 2009
-------

Desiya Murpokku Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam
represented by its  Secretary (Head  Quarters)
B.Parthasarathy
No.125/7, Jawaharlal Nehru Road
Chennai						.. Petitioner

versus

1.Union of India
represented by its Secretary
Ministry of Home Affairs,
New Delhi 110 001.

2.State of Tamil Nadu
represented by its Chief Secretary
Fort. St.George,
Chennai 600 009.

3.Chief of Election Commissioner
Election Commission of India
Nirmachan Bhavan, Ashoka Road
New Delhi 110 001.

4.Chief Electoral Officer and Additional Secretary to Government
Public (Elections) department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai 600 009.

5.Electronics Corporation of India Ltd.,
represented by its Chairman and Managing Director
Hydrabad 500 062, Andhrapradesh, India

6.Bharat Electronics Ltd.,
represented by its Chairman and Managing Director
Bangalore.					     .. Respondents 

	Petition filed under Article 226  of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of Mandamus,  directing the respondents to hold future and forthcoming by elections and assembly elections by adopting the ballot paper system and consequently thereby ban the method of voting by electronic voting machines.
	         For Petitioner        :::  Mr.V.T.Balaji
          	         For Respondents  :::  Mr. S.T.S.Moorthy,
				Government Pleader for R.2
				No appearance for R.1 and R.3 to R.6



O R D E R

(The Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice) The learned counsel for the petitioner states that this petition has become infructuous.

2. The writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous as agreed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. No costs. Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2009 is closed.

					     (S.K.K.,CJ.)       (M.M.S., J)
Index:yes/no				           10th March, 2015

ksr



Copy To

1. The Secretary, Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi 110 001.

2. Chief Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Fort. St.George, Chennai 600 009.

3.Chief of Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India Nirmachan Bhavan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 110 001.

4.Chief Electoral Officer and Additional Secretary to Government Public (Elections) department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

5. Chairman and Managing Director, Electronics Corporation of India Ltd., Hydrabad 500 062, Andhrapradesh, India

6. Chairman and Managing Director, Bharat Electronics Ltd., Bangalore.

The Hon'ble The Chief Justice and M. M. Sundresh, J.

(ksr) W.P.No.9730 of 2009 10.03.2015