Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 14]

Kerala High Court

The Chengamanad Service Co-Operative vs P.R.Mohanan on 30 March, 2009

Author: Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan

Bench: Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 10045 of 2009(A)


1. THE CHENGAMANAD SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. P.R.MOHANAN, FIRST GRADE OVERSEAR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

3. CHIEF ENGINEER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.ANIL K.MOHAMMED

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :30/03/2009

 O R D E R
            THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
                   -------------------------------------------
                    W.P(C).No.10045 OF 2009
                   -------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 30th day of March, 2009


                               JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a co-operative society. It states that from December, 2004 onwards, it had been repeatedly moving the employer of the first respondent for recovery under Section 37 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The principal debtor died. The first respondent is the surety. Section 37(2) provides that if there is a refusal to comply with the request in terms of an agreement under Section 37, a criminal complaint can be filed. The penalty may be too limited. But yet, that is the law of the land. Repeated consecutive failure to oblige a request under Section 37 never, apparently, invites penalty under Section 37(2). The petitioner has also alternate remedy to invoke arbitration under Section 69 of the KCS Act. Either way, I do not find it necessary for this Court to aid the petitioner to recover the amounts due from the first respondent surety. The writ petition fails. The same is dismissed without prejudice to alternate remedies.

Sd/-

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge.

kkb.31/3.