Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Mahesh Chaudhary vs The State Of Bihar on 20 May, 2016

Author: Hemant Kumar Srivastava

Bench: Hemant Kumar Srivastava

      Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21500 of 2016 (2) dt.20-05-2016                                           1




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                     Criminal Miscellaneous No.21500 of 2016
                          Arising Out of PS.Case No. -176 Year- 2015 Thana -GOH District- AURANGABAD
                   ======================================================
                   1. Mahesh Chaudhary son of Late Umesh Chaudhary, resident of village-
                   Jamuaw, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya

                                                                                  .... ....   Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                   1. The State of Bihar

                                                                 .... .... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Arjun Prasad
                   For the Opposite Party/s   Mr. Abhay Kumar 1(App)
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR
                   SRIVASTAVA
                   ORAL ORDER

02/    20.05.2016

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under sections 461, 379, 295, 411, 414, 420 of the Indian Penal Code as well as section 25 of the Antiques & Treasure Act and section 30 (i) (iii) of the Ancient Monument and Archeological Sites & Remains Act.

Neither petitioner is named in the first information report nor anything was recovered from his conscious possession.

Idol of this case appears to have been recovered from the outskirt of the village. The name of the petitioner sprang in this case in the confessional statement of co- accused and later on, petitioner, too, confessed his guilt.

It appears that except the aforesaid material, there is nothing against the petitioner.

Accordingly, petitioner is directed to be released on bail on Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21500 of 2016 (2) dt.20-05-2016 2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad in Goh P.S. Case no. 176/2015.

    shahid                                              (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)


U      T