Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri B C Nanjundaiah vs Assistant Commissioner on 15 July, 2025

                                                  -1-
                                                         NC: 2025:KHC:26949
                                                        WP No. 9696 of 2025


                   HC-KAR



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                            DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2025

                                             BEFORE
                            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
                          WRIT PETITION NO. 9696 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)
                   BETWEEN:

                         SRI. B.C. NANJUNDAIAH,
                         AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
                         S/O CHICKA RUDRAIAH,
                         R/O BELLAVI VILLAGE,
                         MADIVALA POST, MALUR TALUK
                         KOLAR DISTRICT.
                                                               ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI. TAJUDDIN, ADVOCATE)
                   AND:

                   1.    ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
                         KOLAR SUB DIVISION,
                         NEAR COURT CIRCLE,
                         KOLAR - 563 101.

                   2.    TAHASILDAR
Digitally signed         TALUK-OFFICE
by SHARMA
ANAND CHAYA              MALUR - 563 130,
Location: HIGH           KOLAR DISTRICT.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                   3.    TAHASILDAR
                         LAND RECORDS,
                         MALUR - 563 130,
                         KOLAR DISTRICT.

                   4.    REVENUE INSPECTOR
                         KASABA HOBLI,
                         MALUR TALUK - 563 130.
                            -2-
                                      NC: 2025:KHC:26949
                                     WP No. 9696 of 2025


HC-KAR



5.   VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT
     BELLAVI REVENUE CIRCLE, TALUK OFFICE,
     MALUR TALUK - 563 130.

6.   PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY
     CHAIRPERSON
     CHAIRMAN / PRESIDENT
     COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED FOR THE
     PURPOSE OF VERIFYING THE LAND
     RECORDS OF TALUK OFFICE,
     MALUR TALUK - 563 130,
     FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF MISSING FILES.

7.  LAO/SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
    COMPETENT AUTHORITY N.H.A.I BANGALORE,
    CHENNAI EXPRESS HIGHWAY, HEBBALA,
    BANGALORE - 560 024.
                                        ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA)
                          ------
   THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE
RECORDS AND PROCEEDINGS INSOFAR AS IT RELATES TO THE
CASE OF THE PETITIONER AND GRANT HIS PRAYER BY ISSUE
OF WRIT IN RESPECT OF THE SUIT SCHEDULE LANDS BEARING
OLD SURVEY NO. 49 EXTENT 3.00 ACRES OF THE LAND
BELLAVI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK ,KOLAR DIST
IN THE POSSESSION OF BC NANJUNDAIAH S/O LATE
CHICKKARUDRAIAH AND NEW RE SURVEY NO. 48 EXTENT 3.00
ACRES OF LAND BELLAVI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, MALUR
TALUK, KOLAR DIST IN THE POSSESSION OF BC
NANJUNDAIAH S/O LATE CHICKKA RUDRAIAH DIRECTING THE
R-2 TO RESTORE BACK THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN ALL
REVENUE DOCUMENTS OF THE PAHANI RTC COLUMN NO. 9
12(2) MUTATION AND ETC.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
                                     -3-
                                                    NC: 2025:KHC:26949
                                                   WP No. 9696 of 2025


HC-KAR



                             ORAL ORDER

Learned AGA accepts notice for the respondents.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is to consider the representation (Annexure-C) wherein the petitioner has stated that the respondents have to take decision in the matter in the light of the order dated 01.09.2022 in W.P.No.21278/2017 passed by this Court, produced at Annexure-A.

4. In that view of the matter, respondents no.1 to 3 herein are directed to consider the representation at Annexure-C in accordance with law at the earliest, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

With the above said observations, writ petition is disposed of.

SD/-

(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE rs List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33/CT: BHK