Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Jaishree Jha vs Union Of India Through Secretary ... on 20 September, 2016

Author: H. C. Mishra

Bench: H. C. Mishra

            IN     THE       HIGH     COURT   OF    JHARKHAND                 AT      RANCHI
                               W.P. (S) No. 3056 of 2016

            Jaishree Jha                                           ..... ... Petitioner
                                            Versus
            1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Personnel,
              Public Grievance and Pension, Department of Personnel
               and Training, New Delhi.
            2. State of Jharkhand through Principal Secretary,
               Personnel, Administrative Reforms and
                Rajbhasa Department, Ranchi.
            3. State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary,
              Personnel, Administrative Reforms and
               Rajbhasa Department, Patna.
            4. Union Public Service Commission through
               its Secretary, New Delhi.                           ..... ...         Respondents.
                                         --------
                    CORAM        :   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA
                                         ------
            For the Petitioner                        : In person.
            For the Union of India                    : Mrs. A.R. Choudhary, Advocate.
            For the State of Jharkhand                : Mr. Amit Kumar, J.C. to G.P.-II.
            For the State of Bihar                    : Mr. Binit Chandra, J.C. to G.A. (Bihar)
            For the UPSC                              : Mr. Faizur Rahman, Advocate.
                                         --------

 06/ 20.09.2016

The petitioner claims her promotion in I.A.S. cadre, which has been refused by the impugned order dated 11.8.2014, as contained in Annexure-5 to the writ application.

In my considered view, the petitioner has chosen the wrong forum to challenge the aforesaid impugned order, as this is the subject matter of adjudication before the Central Administrative Tribunal.

In that view of the matter, the petitioner, who is appearing in person before this Court, seeks permission to withdraw this application with the liberty to move before the Central Administrative Tribunal for redressal of her grievances.

This writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty, as prayed for.

It goes without saying that the time spent by the petitioner in this Court shall be accounted for, in calculation of the period of limitation before the Central Administrative Tribunal.

( H. C. Mishra, J.) Amitesh/-