Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Tarvinder Kumar And Another vs State Of Haryana on 16 March, 2022

Author: Sureshwar Thakur

Bench: Sureshwar Thakur

117
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                   AT CHANDIGARH

                          Criminal Writ Petition No. 2386 of 2022
                          Date of Decision:16.03.2022

TARVINDER KUMAR AND ANOTHER
                                                              .......... Petitioners
                       Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
                                                            .......... Respondents

CORAM:         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR

Present:        Mr. K.S. Saini, Advocate
                for the petitioners.

                Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, DAG, Haryana.

                     [ Through Video Conferencing ]
                                 ****
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of a mandamus hence directing respondents No.2, and, 3 to give protection to the life, and liberty, of the petitioners, and against any interference in the peaceful life of the petitioners being made at the behest of respondents Nos.4 to 8.

2. The learned State Counsel, does not have any objection, to an order being made by this Court to the respondents concerned, to look into and decide through a speaking order, representation Annexure P-5.

3. Consequently, this Court directs respondents concerned, to within three weeks hereafter, hence decide Annexure P-5, through a speaking order.

4. However, the afore order is subject to the condition that, upon the investigating officer, discovering credible evidence, with respect to the age of the co-petitioner Priyanka, and, in case from the birth certificate 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 17-03-2022 04:14:46 ::: CRWP-2386-2022 -2- concerned, it is clear that she is below 18 years, thereupon, upon, a complaint being filed by the father of the afore, it is open for the investigating officer concerned, to draw an appropriate action, against the accused, in accordance with law. Nonetheless, he may not arrest him without issuing seven days notice upon him.

5. Petition is disposed of.

6. A copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

March 16, 2022                                    ( SURESHWAR THAKUR )
'ithlesh'                                                 JUDGE

            Whether Speaking/reasoned                  Yes/No
            Whether Reportable                         Yes/No




                                 2 of 2
              ::: Downloaded on - 17-03-2022 04:14:47 :::