Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Allahabad High Court

Smt. Saroja Devi vs District Magistrate / Collector ... on 18 June, 2010

Bench: Devi Prasad Singh, Yogendra Kumar Sangal

Court No. - 27

Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 5888 of 2010

Petitioner :- Smt. Saroja Devi
Respondent :- District Magistrate / Collector Sultanpur And Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Suresh Chandra Srivastava
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Devi Prasad Singh,J.

Hon'ble Yogendra Kumar Sangal,J.

Learned standing counsel accepted notice on behalf of parties. No need to issue notice to the private parties.

Earlier a regular civil suit was filed by the petitioner and temporary injunction granted by the trial court. In case if injunction order has been violated, appropriate remedy is available to the petitioner to move an application under Section 151 C.P.C. In order passed in a case reported in 2010 (28) LCD 637 Mohd. Hamja vs. Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) LKO and others, identical controversy has been dealt with.

Accordingly, there is no ground to interfere in writ jurisdiction under Article

226. However, it is provided that in case any application is moved under Section 151 C.P.C. that shall be adjudicated by the trial court within one month in accordance with law.

Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of.

Order Date :- 18.6.2010 Rakesh