Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Adarsh Kumar Alias Tinku vs State Of Punjab on 27 August, 2012

Author: Jitendra Chauhan

Bench: Jitendra Chauhan

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                      CHANDIGARH

                                 CRM No.M-25500 of 2012 (O&M)
                                 Date of decision: 27.8.2012

Adarsh Kumar alias Tinku
                                                                     ...Petitioner

                   Versus

State of Punjab
                                                                 ...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN

Present:     Mr.Harish Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner

                          ****

Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral)

By filing the present petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has sought regular bail in case FIR No.82 dated 22.4.2010, registered under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code (later on converted into Section 304 of IPC) at Police Station Division No.6, Industrial Area, Ludhiana.

Learned counsel contends that out of 30 witnesses only five witnesses have been examined so far. The petitioner is in custody since 22.4.2010.

Heard.

There are specific allegation against the petitioner that he pushed Mansoor Alam forcibly due to which his head struck against the pillar in the factory and he succumbed to his injuries. This Court finds no merit in the present petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.

However, the learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.




27.8.2012                                    (JITENDRA CHAUHAN)
gsv                                                 JUDGE