Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Surya Exim Limited & vs Union Of India & 2 on 25 January, 2018

Bench: Harsha Devani, A.S. Supehia

                C/SCA/23286/2017                                           ORDER



               IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION  NO. 23286 of 2017
         ===================================================
               SURYA EXIM LIMITED  &  1....Petitioner(s)
                                 Versus
                 UNION OF INDIA  &  2....Respondent(s)
         ===================================================
         Appearance:
         MR DHAVAL SHAH, ADVOCATE for Petitioner(s) No.1­2
         MR. S S IYER, ADVOCATE for Petitioner(s) No. 1 ­ 2
         ===================================================
         CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI
                                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA
                            Date : 25/01/2018
                               ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)

1. Heard Mr. S.S. Iyer, learned advocate for the  petitioners.

2. The   petitioner   is   an   importer   of   coal.   The  petitioner   has   challenged   the   constitutional  validity   of   the   Goods   and   Service   Tax  (Compensation   to   States)   Act,   2017   and   the  relevant notifications issued under the said Act,  inter alia, on the ground that the same is ultra   vires  Article 279A  of the Constitution of India.  The main grievance of the petitioner is that on  the coal imported by it prior to the introduction  of  goods  and service   tax regime,   the petitioner  had   already   paid   clean   energy   cess   at   the  prescribed   rate   and   on   the   stock   which   the  petitioner   had   not   cleared,   no   credit   would   be  allowed on such cess and the petitioner would be  asked   to   pay   fresh   cess   under   the   Goods   and  Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Thu Jan 25 23:05:05 IST 2018 C/SCA/23286/2017 ORDER Service   Tax   (Compensation   to   States)   Act,   2017  and the rules made thereunder.

3. The  learned  counsel  for  the  petitioners  has  drawn the attention of the court to the decision  of   the   Delhi   High   Court   in   the   case   of  Mohit   Minerals  Private Limited  v. Union of India, 2017  (4)   G.S.T.L.   433   (Del.)   to   submit   that   in   a  similar   matter   the   court   has   granted   interim  relief to the petitioner.

4. Having regard to the submissions advanced by  the   learned   counsel   for   the   petitioners,   issue  NOTICE and notice as to interim relief returnable  on 16th February, 2018. In view of the fact that  the   validity   of   a   Union   legislation   is  questioned,   let   there   be   NOTICE   to   the  learned  Attorney   General   also.   Direct   service   is  permitted. 

Sd/­        [HARSHA DEVANI, J] Sd/­        [A. S. SUPEHIA, J] *** Bhavesh­[pps]* Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Thu Jan 25 23:05:05 IST 2018