Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd vs Nivetha Tex on 28 August, 2020

Author: N.Sathish Kumar

Bench: N.Sathish Kumar

                                                                                  A.No.1448 of 2020

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED : 28.8.2020

                                                       CORAM :

                           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

                                            Application No.1448 of 2020
                 Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd.
                 Rep. by its Authorised Signatory
                 Mr.K.Sivaraja Pandian
                 4th Floor, Phase II, Spencer Plaza,
                 769, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.                          ... Applicant
                                                         Vs.
                 1 Nivetha Tex
                   Rep. by its Proprietor
                   Mr.R.Boopathi,
                  No.15, Seenakdu Periyasemur,
                  Erode 638 004.

                 2 R.Boopathi
                   Proprietor
                  M/s.Nivetha Tex,
                  No.324/1, Ponni Nagar,
                  3rd Kilakku Veethi, Verapanchatram,
                  Erode 638 004.                                            ... Respondents

                 3 Palanisamy
                   Ellapalayam Road,
                   Sathvikarsha Road,
                   Opp. Periasemur, Erode 638 004.                ...Respondent/Garnishee




                 1/4


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                      A.No.1448 of 2020

                 PRAYER : Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules R/W Section 9
                 (ii) (d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to pass an order prohibiting
                 the Garnishee/Respondent No.3 from making payment of Rs.41,85,015.65 or any
                 amount to the respondents 1 and 2 or to their men, agents, representative or to
                 any one claiming on respondents 1 and 2 behalf and restrain the respondents or
                 their men, agents representatives or any one claiming on respondents 1 and 2
                 from receiving a sum of Rs.41,85,015.65 or any amount from the Garnishee/
                 respondents 3 and further direct the respondent/Garnishee 3 to deposit any
                 amount to the credit of the above application before this Court.


                              For Applicant            : Mr.A.Damodaran
                                                  ******

                                                 ORDER

The counsel appearing for the Garnishee submits that the respondent/ Garnishee is only a landlord and the tenant/respondent left the premises. In fact the tenant/respondents left the premises with arrears of rent.

In reply to the said submission, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks to withdraw the application. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

28.8.2020 2/4 http://www.judis.nic.in A.No.1448 of 2020 Index : Yes/ No Internet : Yes Speaking/Non-speaking Order vaan 3/4 http://www.judis.nic.in A.No.1448 of 2020 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

vaan A.No.1448 of 2020 Dated: 28.8.2020 4/4 http://www.judis.nic.in