Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

M/S. Gabriel India Ltd vs Cce, Chennai on 17 July, 2009

        

 
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX 
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, CHENNAI

 
DM.90/08, E/PD/258/08 & E/303/08

 
(Arising out of Order in Appeal No. 115/2007 (M-VI) dated 28.12.2007, passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, (Appeals),  Chennai).

For approval and signature	

Honble Ms. JYOTI BALASUNDARAM,  Vice President
 
_______________________________________________________
1.    Whether Press Reporters may be allowed to see the	:
       order for Publication as per Rule 27 of the
       CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982?

 2.   Whether it should be released under Rule 27 of the    	:
       CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication 
       in any authoritative report or not?

3.    Whether  the Honble Member wishes to see the fair  	:      
       copy of the  Order.

4.    Whether order is to be circulated to the		 	:
       Departmental Authorities?  _______________________________________________________

M/s. Gabriel India Ltd.			:	Appellant
 
		 Vs.

CCE, Chennai					 :	Respondent 

Appearance None for the appellant Ms. Indira Sisupal, JDR, for the respondent CORAM Honble Ms. JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, Vice President Date of hearing : 17.07.09 Date of decision : 17.07.09 Final ORDER No._____________ In this case, the Registry has pointed out to the assessees that they were required to pay a fee of Rs. 500/- with the application for the condonation of delay in filing the appeal. In spite of such notice, the fee has not been paid. Therefore, the stay application and the appeal are dismissed in terms of Rule 11 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. (Order pronounced and dictated in the open Court) (JYOTI BALASUNDARAM) VICE PRESIDENT BB