Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Lavekesh Kumar @ Labba vs State Of Punjab on 10 October, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
              CHANDIGARH

                      Crl. Misc. No.M-23913 of 2012(O&M)
                      Date of Decision:.10.10.2012

Lavekesh Kumar @ Labba
                                                    ... Petitioner
                      vs.
State of Punjab
                                                 ... Respondent

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK

Present:- Mr. L.S. Goraya, Advocate
          for the petitioner.

           Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. AG Punjab.
                ---

VIJENDER SINGH MALIK,J(ORAL) Lavekesh Kumar @ Labba, the petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in a case registered by way of FIR No. 47 dated 18.7.2012 at Police Station Dorengla, Tehsil and District Gurdaspur, for an offence punishable under section 22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

The case in brief is that a naka was laid in which the petitioner along with one Geeta was seen coming on a Bajaj scooter and though the petitioner succeeded in escaping, Geeta was caught and from her 320 grams of powder was recovered.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on the basis of report of chemical examiner, submits that the powder was tested and it was found containing paracetamol. He further submits that no case is made out even against Geeta from whom this powder was recovered and at least there is no case against the petitioner, from whom nothing was recovered.

Crl. Misc. No.M-23913 of 2012 =2= Learned State counsel, on the other hand, admits that on chemical analysis the powder recovered was found to be containing paracetamol and not any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance.

In these circumstances, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to join the investigation and if he is sought to be arrested, he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting/investigating officer subject to the conditions laid down in section 438 sub section 2 clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

October 10,2012               (VIJENDER SINGH MALIK )
Jiten                                 JUDGE