Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Archana Deepak Verma vs The State Of Maharashtra on 15 January, 2019

Author: Prakash D. Naik

Bench: Prakash D. Naik

       rpa                               1/2                         912-aba-96-19.doc


             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.96 OF 2019


      Archana Deepak Verma                                    .. Applicant
            Vs.
      State of Maharashtra                                    .. Respondent

                                    ......
      Mr.Jitendra B. Mishra, Advocate for the Applicant.

      Mr.S.R. Agarkar, APP for the Respondent - State.

      Mr.Mahesh Ralebhat, PSI L.T. Marg Police Station, Mumbai,
      present.
                                ......
               CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

                        DATED : JANUARY 15, 2019.

      P.C. :

                        The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection

      with C.R. No.167 of 2018, registered              with L.T. Marg Police

      Station, Mumbai, for the offence punishable under Section 408 of

      Indian Penal Code ("IPC", for short).



      2                 Learned APP submits that subsequently charge under

      Sections 109, 212 and 411 read with 34 of IPC were added.



      3                 Learned APP, on instructions from the officer who is

      present in the Court submits that the evidence against the




::: Uploaded on - 16/01/2019                   ::: Downloaded on - 18/01/2019 02:23:37 :::
        rpa                                  2/2                                 912-aba-96-19.doc


      applicant that, out of the crime proceeds, the motorcar was

      purchased in the name of the applicant, and, considering the

      nature of the allegations, custodial interrogation of the applicant

      is not necessary. In the circumstances, case for anticipatory bail

      is made out.



      4                 Hence, I pass the following Order:


                                     :: O R D E R :

:

(i) Anticipatory Bail Application No.96 of 2019, is allowed;
(ii) In the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with C.R. No.167 of 2018, registered with L.T. Marg Police Station, Mumbai, she may be released on bail on her furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/-, with one or more sureties in the like amount;
(iii) Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) ::: Uploaded on - 16/01/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 18/01/2019 02:23:37 :::