Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

Sunitha Kumari vs R.P.Suseela Devi on 7 December, 2002

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM

                                         PRESENT:

                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
                                               &
                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD

                TUESDAY,THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/16TH CHAITHRA, 1938

                                  RFA.No. 388 of 2003 ( )
                                     ------------------------
    AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS NO. 1331/1995 of I ADDITIONAL SUB
                    COURT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 07-12-2002

APPELLANT(PLAINTIFF IN THE COURT BELOW):
------------

          SUNITHA KUMARI, WIFE OF B.RAVI KUMAR, RESIDING ATT.C. 20/2725,
          MEKKONAM ROAD, KARAMANA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

              BY ADV. SRI.K.B.PRADEEP

RESPONDENTS(DEFENDANTS IN THE COURT BELOW):
--------------

          1.     R.P.SUSEELA DEVI, W/O.LATE S.SANKARA NARAYANA PILLAI
                 RESIDING ATPUTHUMANA BHAVAN,NEDUMCAUD ROAD,
                 KARAMANA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

          2.     S.SUNIL KUMAR, SON OF LATE S.SANKARA NARAYANA PILLAI, -DO- -DO-

          3.     S.SURESH KUMAR, -DO- -DO-

          4.     S.SUDHEER KUMAR, -DO- -DO-

          5.     S.SUKESH KUMAR, -DO- -DO-

          6.     S.SIVA KUMAR, -DO- -DO-

          7.     S.SUPRIYA, D/O. -DO- -DO-


                  R2 BY ADVS. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
                               SRI.P.M.BENZIR
                               SRI.DEEPU LAL MOHAN

            THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-04-2016,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:



                ANTONY DOMINIC & A.HARIPRASAD, JJ.
                        --------------------------------------
                            R.F.A.No.388 of 2003
                        --------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 5th day of April, 2016

                                  JUDGMENT

Antony Dominic, J.

In the appeal, filed in the year 2003, notice sent on 07.08.2013 to respondents 1 and 3 to 7 has been returned with the endorsement 'left'. In spite of opportunities given, no further steps have been taken to make service complete on the said respondents. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.

A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

cks