Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 29, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Pawan vs State Of Haryana on 26 July, 2023

Author: Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench: Jasjit Singh Bedi

                                                    Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095263




                                                       2023:PHHC:095263



CRM-M-856-2023 (O & M)                                                  ::1::

(227)


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                        CHANDIGARH


                                               CRM-M-856-2023 (O & M)
                                               Date of Decision: 26.07.2023


Pawan
                                                                   ... Petitioner

                                     Versus
State of Haryana
                                                                 ...Respondent


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present:     Mr. Vinod Ghai, Sr. Advocate,
             with Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate and
             Mr. Saurav Dogra, Advocate,
             for the petitioner.

             Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

             ****

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.

The prayer in the present petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.75 dated 29.07.2021 under Section 15 of Petroleum and Mineral Pipeline (Acquisition of Rights of User in L.D.) Act, 1962, Section 3 & 4 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Sections 379, 427/34 IPC and Section 3 & 4 of PDPP Act, 1984 registered at Police Station Rohadai, District Rewari.





                                1 of 9
             ::: Downloaded on - 29-07-2023 01:15:18 :::
                                                    Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095263




                                                      2023:PHHC:095263



CRM-M-856-2023 (O & M)                                                 ::2::

(227)


2. The present FIR came to be registered on the basis of a written application moved by the Operation Manager. As per the Manager IOCL, he had gone to the spot on being asked by the Guard Sukhbir on 29.07.2021 that Crude Oil was spilling in the vicinity of Umed's fields and that someone had installed a hole/valve in the pipeline. Based on the information, the officials from IOCL had visited the site and an area adjacent to the pipeline where they had discovered that a valve/hole had been installed in the pipeline thereby committing the act of theft of Crude Oil and damage to property. On the basis of the complaint filed, the FIR came to be registered.

During the course of investigation, co-accused Ravi Kumar, Harish alias Mistri, Anil alias Sonu, Ravinder alias Bablu, Vijay alias Ajay, Binder, Suraj, Manish and Sunny were arrested in FIR No.112/2021 registered at Police Station Bawal. They were interrogated. They admitted their involvement in the commission of the present offence as well. They were arrested in the present case and interrogated. Based on their disclosure statements, offences punishable under Sections 117, 120-N, 411 IPC were added to the case. It came on record that the equipment and vehicles used by the said accused in commission of the present crime had already been recovered by them while being in custody in connection with FIR No.112 of 2021 registered at Police Station Bawal.





                               2 of 9
            ::: Downloaded on - 29-07-2023 01:15:18 :::
                                                      Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095263




                                                        2023:PHHC:095263



CRM-M-856-2023 (O & M)                                                   ::3::

(227)


Thereafter, a sum of Rs.1700 was recovered from Suraj, a sum of Rs.1300/- was recovered from Sunny and a sum of Rs.2300/- was recovered from Ravinder alias Chirkut, a sum of Rs.1600/- was recovered from Ravi, a sum of Rs.3200/- was recovered from Harish, a sum of Rs.3700/- was recovered from Binder, a sum of Rs.1400/- was recovered from Vijay, a sum of Rs.1000/- was recovered from Manish alias Sonu and a sum of Rs.2400/- was recovered from Anil. The recovered amounts were taken into possession in terms of separate memos prepared in this regard. The arrested accused got demarcated the places of occurrence.

During further investigation, it was found that co-accused Nakul Bedi was a habitual criminal and was involved in the sale and purchase of stolen oil and accordingly, the offences punishable under Sections 413 and 15(IV) of PMPL Amendment Act, 2021 were added to the case and the offence punishable under Section 411 IPC was dropped. The final report qua the above-named accused was submitted in the Court on 10.05.2022.

During the course of further investigation, accused Dinesh Rathi and Narender Singh were arrested in the present case on 19.09.2022. They were interrogated while being in custody and they admitted their involvement in the commission of the present crime as well.





                                 3 of 9
              ::: Downloaded on - 29-07-2023 01:15:18 :::
                                                        Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095263




                                                          2023:PHHC:095263



CRM-M-856-2023 (O & M)                                                     ::4::

(227)


The petitioner-PAwan, co-accused Desh Raj and Nakul Bedi had been arrested in the another case. Their production warrants were issued and they were joined in the investigation in the present case as well when they were arrested.

A sum of Rs.10,000/- was recovered from the petitioner- Pawan whereas a sum of Rs.30,000/- was recovered from the co-accused- Nakul Bedi and likewise, a sum of Rs.10,000/- was recovered from co-accused Dinesh Rathi from the proceeds of the sale of stolen oil.

Consequent upon the completion of the investigation qua the petitioner-Pawan, Narender, Dinesh Rathi and Nakul Bedi, a supplementary report under Section 173(8) was submitted in the Court on 18.12.2022.

During the course of further investigation, co-accused Sunil alias Banda was arrested and the final report qua him was also submitted in the Court.

3. The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR but has been arrayed as an accused later on as per the disclosure statements of the arrested accused. The said disclosure statements have no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. As the petitioner was in custody since 23.09.2022 and only 04 out of the 29 prosecution witnesses had been examined so far, he was entitled to the concession of bail, moreso, when in three other similar cases 4 of 9 ::: Downloaded on - 29-07-2023 01:15:18 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095263 2023:PHHC:095263 CRM-M-856-2023 (O & M) ::5::

(227)

registered against him vide FIR No.264 dated 26.12.2021 under Sections 379, 413, 34, 117, 411, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 201 IPC, Sections 15/16 and 15(IV) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 2021, Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 at Police Station Rampura, FIR No. 112 dated 10.04.2021 under Sections 379/413/34/117/411/420/467/468/ 471/120-B/201 IPC, Sections 15/16 and 15(IV) of the Petroleum and Mineral Pipe Line Act, 2021, 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act, Sections 3/4 Prevention of Damage to the Public Property Act, 1984 at Police Station Bawal and FIR No.94 dated 25.03.2021 under Sections 379/413/117/120B/34 IPC, 15/16 of the Petroleum and Mineral Pipe Line Act, 1962 and 15(IV) of Petroleum and Mineral Pipe Line Act, 2021, 3/4 Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Sections 3/4 PDPP Act, 1984 and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1984 and Section 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Bawal, District Rewari, he has been granted the concession of bail vide orders dated 12.05.2023 passed in CRM-M-1059-2023, order dated 02.05.2023 passed in CRM-

M-864-2023 and order dated 14.07.2023 passed in CRM-M-860-2023 respectively.

4. The learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, contends that the petitioner is the person who used to purchase the stolen oil at a discounted rate and it cannot be believed that he was unaware of 5 of 9 ::: Downloaded on - 29-07-2023 01:15:18 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095263 2023:PHHC:095263 CRM-M-856-2023 (O & M) ::6::

(227)

the fact that the said oil had been stolen. He contends that the petitioner was an accused in five other cases registered vide FIRs No.156 dated 07.09.2020 under Sections 323/364/34 IPC at Police Station Sector 37, Gurugram, FIR No.93 dated 26.03.2021 under Sections 379/286/268/285/34 IPC and 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 3 of the Motor Sprit and High Speed Diesel Order 1908, 15, 16 PMP Act, 1962 at Police Station Badli, FIR No.264 dated 26.12.2021 under Sections 379, 413, 34, 117, 411, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 201 IPC, Sections 15/16 and 15(IV) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 2021, Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 at Police Station Rampura, FIR No. 112 dated 10.04.2021 under Sections 379/413/34/117/411/420/467/468/471/120-B/201 IPC, Sections 15/16 and 15(IV) of the Petroleum and Mineral Pipe Line Act, 2021, 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act, Sections 3/4 Prevention of Damage to the Public Property Act, 1984 at Police Station Bawal and FIR No.94 dated 25.03.2021 under Sections 379/413/117/120B/34 IPC, 15/16 of the Petroleum and Mineral Pipe Line Act, 1962 and 15(IV) of Petroleum and Mineral Pipe Line Act, 2021, 3/4 Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Sections 3/4 PDPP Act, 1984 and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1984 at Police Station Bawal, District Rewari, and therefore, the criminal antecedents of the petitioner did not entitle him to the grant of bail. He,

6 of 9 ::: Downloaded on - 29-07-2023 01:15:18 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095263 2023:PHHC:095263 CRM-M-856-2023 (O & M) ::7::

(227)

however, concedes the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 23.09.2022, only 04 out of the 29 prosecution witnesses have been examined so far and in three cases of identical nature arising out of FIR No.112 dated 10.04.2021, FIR No.264 dated 26.12.2021 and FIR No.94 dated 25.03.2021, the petitioner has already been granted the concession of bail either by this Court or by the Sessions Court.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
6. Admittedly, the petitioner is named in the disclosure statements of his co-accused. Whether the other evidence available against the petitioner is sufficient to affix liability upon him would be a matter of adjudication during the course of the Trial. At this stage, the petitioner is in custody since 23.09.2022, investigation stands completed and only 04 of the 29 prosecution witnesses have been examined so far.

In three other similar cases registered against him vide FIR No.112 dated 10.04.2021 under Sections 379/413/34/117/411/420/467/468/471/ 120-B/201 IPC, Sections 15/16 and 15(IV) of the Petroleum and Mineral Pipe Line Act, 2021, 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act, Sections 3/4 Prevention of Damage to the Public Property Act, 1984 at Police Station Bawal, FIR No.264 dated 26.12.2021 under Sections 379, 413, 34, 117, 411, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 201 IPC, Sections 15/16 and 15(IV) of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 2021, Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Sections 3 and 4 of the 7 of 9 ::: Downloaded on - 29-07-2023 01:15:18 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095263 2023:PHHC:095263 CRM-M-856-2023 (O & M) ::8::

(227)

Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 at Police Station Rampura, and FIR No.94 dated 25.03.2021 under Sections 379, 34, 117, 120-B, 413 IPC, Sections 15, 16, 15(iv) Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquision of Rights of User in Land) Act, 1962, Sections 3, 4 Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 3, 4 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and Section 25 of the Arms Act, at Police Station Bawal, District Rewari, he has already been granted the concession of bail by this Court vide orders dated 02.05.2023 passed in CRM-M-864-2023, order dated 12.05.2023 passed in CRM-M-1059- 2023, and order dated 14.07.2023 passed in CRM-M-860-2023 respectively. Therefore, his further incarceration in the present case is not required.
7. Thus, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner-Pawan is ordered to be released on regular bail subject to his furnishing requisite bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
8. The petitioner shall appear on the first Monday of every month before the police station concerned till the conclusion of the trial and furnish an affidavit each time that he is not involved in any case/crime other than the case(s) mentioned in this order.

8 of 9 ::: Downloaded on - 29-07-2023 01:15:18 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095263 2023:PHHC:095263 CRM-M-856-2023 (O & M) ::9::

(227)

9. In addition, the petitioner (or through someone else on his behalf) shall prepare an FDR in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and deposit the same with the Trial Court. The same would be liable to be forfeited as per law in case of the absence of the petitioner from Trial without sufficient cause.

(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE July 26, 2023 sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095263 9 of 9 ::: Downloaded on - 29-07-2023 01:15:18 :::