Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Chattisgarh High Court

Smt. Ranjana Mehra vs Smt. Shanti Vastrakar 7 Wps/693/2018 ... on 19 January, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                            1

                                                                                  NAFR

               HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                  MCC No. 16 of 2018

     1. Smt. Ranjana Mehra, W/o Shri Sanjeev Kumar, aged about 33 years, Caste
        Mehra (Scheduled Caste) R/o Raj Kishore Nagar, Tahsil and District
        Bilaspur (C.G.)

                                                                           ---- Petitioner

                                        Versus

     1. Smt. Shanti Vastrakar, W/o Shri Khemraj Vastrakar, R/o Village Lingiyadih,
        Rajkishore Nagar, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.)

     2. Sub-Divisional Officer (R) Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

                                                                        ---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Pawar, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 19/01/18 Heard on application for restoration of Writ Petition (227) No. 3034 of 2010.

2. The applicant is seeking restoration of Writ Petition (227) No. 3034 of 2010 which was dismissed by this Court for want of prosecution vide order dated 07.12.2017.

3. On due consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, I am satisfied that the absence of the applicant's counsel on 07.12.2017, when the Writ Petition (227) No. 3034 of 2010 was taken up for hearing, was based on bonafide grounds.

4. The M.C.C. No. 16 of 2018 is, therefore, allowed and the Writ Petition 2 (227) No. 3034 of 2010 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs.3000/- (Three Thousand Only) to the High Court Legal Aid Committee within ten days from today.

5. It is made clear that the M.C.C. is restored without the interim order. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to file a fresh application for interim order, if any.

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka