Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Madras High Court

Syed Khaja Hussain vs The Addl. Chief Secretary To Government on 30 March, 2023

Bench: M.Sundar, M.Nirmal Kumar

                                                                                      H.C.P.No.1906 of 2022

                                      THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      DATED : 30.03.2023

                                                            CORAM

                                      THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
                                                      and
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

                                                     H.C.P.No.1906 of 2022

                     Syed Khaja Hussain
                     S/o.Navas                                          .. Petitioner /
                                                                          friend of Detenu

                                                                Vs

                     1.The Addl. Chief Secretary to Government,
                       Home, Prohibition and Excise Department,
                       Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

                     2.The Commissioner of Police
                       Greater Chennai

                     3.The Superintendent of Prison,
                       Central Prison, Puzhal
                       Chennai - 66

                     4. The Inspector of Police, Crime
                        D-2 Anna Salai Police Station
                        Chennai                                                     .. Respondents
                                  Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
                     for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to call for the entire records in


                     Page Nos.1/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                       H.C.P.No.1906 of 2022

                     connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent
                     dated 26.08.2022 in Memo No.251/BCDFGISSSV/2022 against the
                     petitioner's friend Venkatesan @ Venkat, male aged 26 years, son of
                     Manivannan, who is confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai and set
                     aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this
                     Court and set him at liberty.
                                  For Petitioner           :     Mr.S.Senthilvel

                                  For Respondents          :     Mr.R.Muniyapparaj
                                                                 Additional Public Prosecutor
                                                                 Assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John

                                                               ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,] Captioned 'Habeas Corpus Petition' ['HCP' for the sake of brevity] has been filed by mother of detenu assailing a 'preventive detention order dated 26.08.2022 bearing reference BCDFGISSSV No.251/2022' [hereinafter 'impugned detention order' for the sake of convenience and brevity]. To be noted, fourth respondent is the sponsoring authority and second respondent is the detaining authority as impugned detention order has been made by second respondent.

Page Nos.2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.1906 of 2022

2.Impugned detention order has been made under 'The Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber law offenders, Drug-offenders, Forest-offenders, Goondas, Immoral traffic offenders, Sand-offenders, Sexual-offenders, Slum-grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act No.14 of 1982)' [hereinafter 'Act 14 of 1982' for the sake of convenience and clarity] on the premise that the detenu is a 'Goonda' within the meaning of Section 2(f) of Act 14 of 1982.

3.There is one adverse case. The ground case which is the sole substratum of the impugned detention order is Crime No.132 of 2022 on the file of D-2 Anna Salai Police Station for alleged offences under Sections 395 read with 397 of 'The Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860)' [hereinafter 'IPC' for the sake of convenience and clarity]. Owing to the nature of the challenge to the impugned detention order, it is not necessary to delve into the factual matrix or be detained further by facts.

4.Mr.S.Senthilvel, learned counsel on record for petitioner and Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, learned State Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John, learned counsel for all respondents are before us. Page Nos.3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.1906 of 2022

5.Though several grounds have been urged in the support affidavit, learned counsel for petitioner at the hearing exhorted one point in his campaign against the impugned detention order and that one point turns on delay in considering a representation sent qua impugned detention order.

6.Responding to the aforementioned submission, learned State Additional Public Prosecutor submitted to the contrary and placed before us a list of dates and the details of the same are as follows:

                                  'Representation dated                    ..    28.01.2023

                                  Representation received dated            ..    31.01.2023
                                  File submitted on dated                  ..    06.02.2023
                                  Under Secretary dealt with on            ..    06.02.2023
                                  Deputy Secretary dealt with on           ..    06.02.2023
                                  Minister dealt with on                   ..    13.02.2023
                                  Rejected letter prepared on              ..    13.02.2023
                                  Rejection letter sent to the detenu on ..      14.02.2022
                                  Govt. Holidays falls on:

04.02.2023, 05.02.2023, 11.02.2023, 12.02.2023 S.No. Representation Column 6 to 7 Column 9 to 10 1. No. of days 05 06 2. No. of holidays 02 02 No. of delay days 03 04 Total 7 days delay Page Nos.4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.1906 of 2022

7.We find that even if the intervening 4 public/Government holidays 04.02.2023, 05.02.2023, 11.02.2023 and 12.02.2023 are excluded, there is a delay of 7 days in considering the representation. We make it clear that the delay in considering the representation point in challenges to preventive detention orders cannot be decided quantitatively. It has to be decided qualitatively based on the facts, circumstances and the trajectory the representation has taken, in other words, it has to be decided on case to case basis. In the case on hand, we adopt such an approach and we find that 7 days delay vitiates the impugned detention order. We also hasten to make it clear that there can be no straight jacket formula in terms of number of days as regards this point is concerned and therefore, this order will not serve as precedent in all and every case.

8.Ergo, the sequitur is, captioned HCP is allowed. Impugned detention order dated 26.08.2022 bearing reference BCDFGISSSV No.251/2022 made by the second respondent is set aside and the detenu Thiru.Venkatesan @ Venkat, aged 26 years, son of Thiru.Manivannan, is Page Nos.5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.1906 of 2022 directed to be set at liberty forthwith, if not required in connection with any other case / cases. There shall be no order as to costs.

                                                                   (M.S.,J.)             (M.N.K.,J.)
                                                                                30.03.2023
                     Index : Yes
                     Neutral Citation : Yes
                     Speaking Order
                     gpa

P.S: Registry to forthwith communicate this order to Jail authorities in Central Prison, Puzhal.

Page Nos.6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.1906 of 2022 To

1.The Addl. Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Puzhal Chennai - 66

4. The Inspector of Police, Crime D-2 Anna Salai Police Station Chennai

5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Page Nos.7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.1906 of 2022 M.SUNDAR, J., and M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J., gpa H.C.P.No.1906 of 2022 30.03.2023 Page Nos.8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis