Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

P.Subramanian vs The Secretary To Government on 4 April, 2016

Author: T.Raja

Bench: T.Raja

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
						
DATED 04.04.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA

W.P. No.12516 of 2016

P.Subramanian							.. Petitioner

-vs-

1.The Secretary to Government,
Transport Department,
St. George Fort,
Chennai-600 009.

2.The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport
Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd.,
3/137, Chalamedu Vazhtha Reddi (Post),
Villupuram  605 602.						.. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.08.2014 to reconstruct the petitioner's service book as in the case Allphones and pay pension for Government Service with arrears. 
		For Petitioner	:	Mr.K.Malaikannu

		For respondents	:	Mr.R.Vijayakumar, 
						Additional Government Pleader 
						for R1

				       O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.08.2014 to reconstruct the petitioner's service book as in the case of Allphones and pay pension for Government Service with arrears.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent.

3.A perusal of the affidavit shows that the petitioner was appointed as Driver on 06.10.1966 in the erstwhile Tamil Nadu State Transport Department and while he was in service, he requested the Management to grant him leave till he recover from illness and rejoins duty. It further reveals that the Management refused to grant him leave and removed him from service in the year 1984 and he has not challenged the order of removal from service. Without challenging the said removal order, he has come to this Court seeking a direction to the second respondent to consider his representation dated 28.08.2014. When the petitioner himself has stated in the affidavit that he has not challenged the order of removal from service, this writ petition cannot be entertained, as the question of granting pension does not arise. Accordingly, the Writ Petition fails and the same is dismissed. No costs. 04.04.2016 vga To

1.The Secretary to Government, Transport Department, St. George Fort, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., 3/137, Chalamedu Vazhtha Reddi (Post), Villupuram  605 602.

T.RAJA,J.

vga W.P. No.12516 of 2016 04.04.2016