Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 11, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Munnu Lal vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. ... on 21 September, 2024

Author: Karunesh Singh Pawar

Bench: Karunesh Singh Pawar





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:65576
 
Court No. - 14
 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2140 of 2024
 
Applicant :- Munnu Lal
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Kumar Shukla
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
 

The present bail application under Section 438 Cr.PC. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime/FIR No. 5649/2009, under Sections 419/420/468/469/120-B/352/504/506 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali, District Unnao.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

Learned AGA has submitted that FIR is of 2009. The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 4078/2010 "Mannu Lal Vs. State of U.P. and another" in which initially the proceedings were stayed vide order dated 21.10.2010, however, at the later stage, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 02.11.2017 and since then the applicant has not appeared before the trial court. The trial of the case is lingering due to non-cooperation of the applicant.

On due consideration of the delay in approaching the Court, so also the fact that after dismissal of 482 petition, the applicant has not cooperated in the trial for the last seven years, this Court is of the opinion that no case for anticipatory bail is made out.

Accordingly, the bail application of the applicant is rejected.

Order Date :- 21.9.2024 R.C.