Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

The M.K.V.D.C., Thr Ex. Engineer, Sina ... vs Gokul Krishnath Bhange And Anr on 9 April, 2019

Author: V.L. Achliya

Bench: V.L. Achliya

                                                                   2776.19CA+.odt
                                             1


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                  934 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2776 OF 2019
                            IN FAST/4935/2019
                   WITH CA/2780/2019 IN FAST/5144/2019
                   WITH CA/2782/2019 IN FAST/5132/2019
                   WITH CA/2786/2019 IN FAST/5135/2019
                   WITH CA/2788/2019 IN FAST/5147/2019
                   WITH CA/2790/2019 IN FAST/5151/2019
                   WITH CA/2792/2019 IN FAST/5141/2019
                   WITH CA/2794/2019 IN FAST/5157/2019

              THE M.K.V.D.C., THR EX. ENGINEER, SINA
             KOLEGAON PROJECT, PARANDA, OSMANABAD AND
                              OTHERS
                              VERSUS
                  GOKUL KRISHNATH BHANGE AND ANR
                                ...
          Mr.A.M. Gaikwad,Advocate for the applicants.
          Mr.S.A. Deshmukh holding for Mr.M.S. Patil,
          Advocate for the Respondents.
                                ...
                         CORAM: V.L. ACHLIYA,J.
                         DATE : 09.04.2019

          ORAL ORDER:

1. The applicants/appellants have filed these applications seeking stay to the execution of Award passed by the Reference Court, which is subject matter of respective appeals preferred by applicants/appellants.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the challenge raised in these appeals confines to the interest ::: Uploaded on - 11/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 12/04/2019 00:38:32 ::: 2776.19CA+.odt 2 awarded under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act. By referring to the judgment of Full Bench in the case of State of Maharashtra V/s Kailash Shiva Rangari reported in 2016(3) Mh.L.J. 457 (F.B.), learned counsel submits that the appellants have good case to succeed in appeals. The appellants have already deposited the amount in terms of award except the disputed amount of interest awarded under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act. Learned counsel submits that in view of the amount deposited, except the disputed amount, the execution of the impugned judgment and award be stayed.

3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents-claimants opposed the applications and submits that the judgment and award passed by the Reference Court needs no interference and the amount of interest awarded is in accordance with law. He submits that the applicants/appellants be directed to deposit the amount and the same shall not be withdrawn by the respondents till the decision of appeals.

4. Considering submissions advanced by ::: Uploaded on - 11/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 12/04/2019 00:38:32 ::: 2776.19CA+.odt 3 learned counsel appearing for the parties, the applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause "A" in respective applications, subject to deposit of amount by the applicants/appellants to the extent of 50% of the disputed amount. The amount be deposited within eight weeks from the date of order. The amount deposited to be remained invested in fixed deposit till disposal of appeals.

5. The applications seeking stay to the execution of Award are disposed of in above terms.

[V.L. ACHLIYA] JUDGE SGA ::: Uploaded on - 11/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 12/04/2019 00:38:32 :::