Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

V.P.Palani vs Kala on 27 September, 2019

Author: R.Mahadevan

Bench: R.Mahadevan

                                                                               CMA No.1556 of 2017

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED : 27.09.2019

                                                        CORAM

                                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

                                              C.M.A.No.1556 of 2017

                      Lalitha, w/o.Palani (died)

                      1.V.P.Palani
                      2.V.P.Sampath Kumar
                      3.V.P.Selvendran
                      4.V.P.Girija                                       ...    Appellants

                                                             Vs

                      1.Kala

                      2.Shriram General Insurance Co.Limited
                        No.66, 2nd Floor, City Centre Complex
                        Thirumalaipillai Road,
                        Chennai-600 001.                                ...     Respondents


                            Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the
                      judgment and decree dated 04.11.2016 made in MCOP No.1118 of
                      2010 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (III Additional
                      District Court), Poonamallee.



                                  For Appellants      : Mr.K.Varadha Kamaraj

                                  For Respondents : No appearance for R1
                                                    Mr.S.Dhakshnamoorthy for R2




                      1/6

http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                            CMA No.1556 of 2017

                                                     JUDGMENT

This appeal is preferred by the appellants/claimants against the award of a sum of Rs.7,874/- towards compensation due to the death of the wife of the first appellant, in a motor vehicle accident.

2.The case in brief, is as follows:

On the fateful day, ie. 23.10.2010 at about 09.30 a.m., the deceased Lalitha was sweeping along with 3 other co-workers in the Maduravoyal Bye-Pass Road near Porur Bridge. At that time, the TATA Indica Car bearing Reg.No.PY-01-AB-5544 belonging to the first respondent herein and insured with the second respondent Insurance Company, came from behind in a rash and negligent manner from Tambaram to Maduravoyal direction and dashed against the deceased as well as the other co-workers. Due to the said impact, the deceased sustained grievous injuries on her hand and all over the body and in the course of treatment, she died. The legal heirs of the deceased filed a claim petition before the Tribunal, claiming a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as compensation. On consideration of the materials and evidence available on record, the Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.7,874/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of petition.
2/6 http://www.judis.nic.in CMA No.1556 of 2017

3.Challenging the same, the appellants-claimants have filed the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

4.The learned counsel for the appellants /claimants has submitted that the Tribunal has erred in coming to the conclusion that the deceased died only due to cancer and not due to the injuries suffered in the accident. He further submitted that the Tribunal has awarded only a meagre sum of Rs.7,874/- towards medical expenses and not awarded any amount towards loss of estate and loss of income. Stating so, the learned counsel prayed for enhancement of compensation.

5.The learned counsel for the second respondent / Insurance Company has submitted that the Tribunal has rightly considered the materials and evidence available on record and has awarded the just, fair and reasonable compensation and hence the same does not require any interference in the hands of this Court.

6.Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for the second respondent and perused the materials and evidence available on record carefully and meticulously. 3/6 http://www.judis.nic.in CMA No.1556 of 2017

7.It is seen that the deceased was taking treatment as in-patient from 23.10.2010 to 10.11.2010, 05.03.2011 to 02.04.2011, 13.04.2011 to 10.11.2011 and she died on 19.11.2011. She was working as sweeper in the National Highways Authority of India. Due to the accident, she suffered fracture in left leg and grievous injuries in the abdomen. In the circumstances, the Tribunal has awarded only a sum of Rs.7,874/- towards medical expenses, without taking note of all other aspects. Considering the period of treatment undergone by the deceased, nature of injuries and other aspects, this Court deems it fit to enhance the compensation awarded by the Tribunal to Rs.53,874/-. The details of the modified compensation are as under:

                                        HEADS                       AMOUNT
                                                                     (Rs.)

                             Loss of income for 5 months            20,000/-
                             Transport expenses                       5,000/-
                             Extra nourishment                      10,000/-
                             Attender Charges                       10,000/-
                             Damages to clothes & articles            1,000/-
                             Medical expenses                         7,874/-
                                                                ----------------
                                                 TOTAL...           53,874/-
                                                                =========




                      4/6

http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                            CMA No.1556 of 2017



8.Thus, the appellants / claimants are entitled to the modified compensation of Rs.53,874/-. It is made clear that only for the compensation of Rs.7,874/- awarded by the Tribunal, the interest rate of 7.5% per annum shall be calculated from the date of claim petition. For the enhanced amount of Rs.46,000/-, the interest rate of 7.5% shall be calculated from the date of filing of this appeal.

9.The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above. No costs.

10.The second respondent Insurance Company is directed to deposit the modified compensation as ordered above, less the amount if any already deposited, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. On such deposit being made, the appellants / claimants shall withdraw the same, on making proper application before the Tribunal.

                      Index       : Yes/No                                      27.09.2019
                      Internet    : Yes/No

                      KM



                      5/6

http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                           CMA No.1556 of 2017



                                                                           R.MAHADEVAN, J.

                                                                                          KM


                      To

1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (III Additional District Court), Poonamallee.

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court.

C.M.A.No.1556 of 2017

27.09.2019 6/6 http://www.judis.nic.in