Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Seapol Port Private Limited vs The Assistant Commissioner Of State ... on 22 December, 2020

Bench: C.Praveen Kumar, R Raghunandan Rao

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARA
(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMB

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

: PRESENT: iG

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR:

AND u

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANADAN

 
   
  

WRIT PETITION NO: 8395 OF 2020

Between:

Seapol Port Private Limited, Door No. 11-12-15 Ground Floor, Archana Building
Wilderness Drive Dasapalla Hills, Visakhapatnam, AP- 530003.

Represented by its Commercial Manager Mr.M.K.Hussain, S/o. Mr. Mir Asad Hussian,
R/o House No. 6/45, Ramamurthy Colony, 3% Street, T.V.K.Nagar, Chennai - 600 082

.. Petitioner
AND

1. The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Andhra Pradesh, Krupum Market
Circle, Visakhapatnam
2. The Chief Commissioner of State Tax, Andhra Pradesh, DNo.5-59, R. K. Spring
Valley, Apartments, Bandar Road, Eedupugallu Village, Kankipadu Mandal,
Vijayawada, Krishna District, Pin - 521144
...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to
issue a Writ of Certiorari or Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction
declaring, A. The Assessment Order u/s 62 APGST Act, 2017 and CSGT Act 2017
dated 24.03.2020 pertaining to the tax period November 2019 be declared as deemed
to be withdrawn in terms of section 62(2) inasmuch the GSTR 3B return for November
2019 has already been filed by the Petitioner on 07.04.2020.

B. The Assessment Orders u/s 62 for the tax periods December 2019, January
2020 and February 2020 be declared as bad and non-est in law and void ab initio as the
same have been issued without complying with the preconditions mandated under
Section 62 of the APGST Act, 2017 and CSGT Act 2017 and Circular No. 129/48/2019 -
GST dated 24.12.2019 and Reference of the Chief Commissioner of State Tax, Andhra
Pradesh, No. 06/2020 OR

C. The time period for compliance of the Assessment Orders u/s 62 for the tax
periods December 2019, January 2020 and February 2020 be declared as extended till
30.06.2020 instead of 23.04.2020 by virtue of Notification No. 35/2020 dated
03.04.2020 issued by the CBIC, Ministry of Finance, Government of India.

D. The Notice u/s 79(1)(c) of APGST Act, 2017 dated 13.04.2020 attaching the
bank account of the Petitioner be declared as illegal, invalid and non-est in law and may
be quashed and further direct the Respondent No. 1 to not undertake any further
recovery proceedings.

1A NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to

i. suspend/stay the operation of the Notice dated 13.04.2020 u/s 79(1)(c) of the
Andhra Pradesh Goods & Services Act, 2017.
 

ii. Suspend/stay the operation of both the Assessment Orders u/s 62 of the
Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Central Goods and Services
Tax Act, 2017

li. Suspend/stay the operation of the two demand orders in Form DRC 07 dated
13.04.2020 pertaining to the tax periods November -- December 2019 and January -
February 2020 issued by Respondent No. 1

iv. Restrain the Respondent No. 1 from initiating further recovery proceedings
and coercive actions till the, pending disposal of WP 8395 of 2020, on the file of the
High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit
filed in support thereof and the orders of the High Court dated 04-05-2020, 22-06-2020,
21.07.2020 & 26-11-2020 made therein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Kristam
Sakthi Niranjan Guptha, Advocate for the Petitioner and GP for Commercial Tax for the
Respondents, the Court made the following.

ORDER:

No representation on behalf of the petitioner. List the matter on 27.01.2021. Meanwhile, counter affidavit, if any, shall be field by the respondents. The interim direction granted earlier, is extended by six weeks. Sd/-T.Madhavi ITTRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR | SECTION OFFICER --

To

1. One CC to Sri Kristam Sakthi Niranjan Guptha, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP for Commercial Tax, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

3. Two spare copies Tvr HIGH COURT CPKJ & RRRJ DATED: 22.12.2020 NOTE: POST ON 27.01.2020 ORDER WP.No.8395 of 2020 EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDER