Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Association And Anr vs Kolkata Municipal Corporation And Ors on 2 September, 2024

Author: Kausik Chanda

Bench: Kausik Chanda

  Sl. 21
02.09.2024
 Suman
 Ct.No.15

                                    WPA 19855 of 2023

                          94, Rabindra Sarani Tenants Welfare
                                 Association and Anr.
                                         Vs.
                          Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.


             Mr. Tapas Kumar Sinha
                             ..for the petitioners


             Mr. Gopal Chandra Das
             Ms. Ujani Pal
                         ..for KMC

             Mr. Rajdeep Bhattacharya
             Md. Imteyaj Alam Lodhi
                         ..for respondent nos. 9 to 13.

Let the report filed by the Corporation be kept with the records.

In this writ petition, the petitioners challenge a notice issued by the Kolkata Municipal Corporation under Section 411(2) of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980.

It appears that in respect of a five-storey-building at premises no. 94, Rabindra Sarani, Kolkata -700073, a notice under Section 411(1) of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 was issued since the building was found to be in a dilapidated and ruinous condition. 2 On the approval of the competent authority a notice board declaring the building as "dangerous building" was also affixed to the premises.

The tenants of the building, however, did not take any steps in terms of the notice issued under Section 411(1) of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, to repair the existing building under the supervision of an empanelled structural engineer or licensed building surveyor.

Accordingly, the Corporation issued a notice under Section 411(2) of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 on November 19, 2019, to vacate the said premises to avoid accidental hazards.

The learned advocate appearing for respondent nos. 9 to 13, who claim to be the landlords of the premises submits that the building should be demolished and that they are willing to allocate the proportionate share of the tenants in the newly constructed building.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners gives an undertaking before this Court that the petitioners will comply with the notice under Section 411(1) of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 and take immediate steps to repair the building.

Since the Corporation is of the view that the building can be repaired under the supervision of a competent officer, I restrain the Corporation from 3 implementing the notice under Section 411(2) of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 for a period of three months from date.

The petitioners shall engage an empanelled engineer or licensed building surveyor from the approved list of the Corporation within a period of fourteen days from date and start repairing work immediately thereafter.

It is clarified that if the petitioners fail to repair the building within a period of five months from date, the Corporation shall be at liberty to take necessary steps in accordance with law.

It is clarified that the tenants in undertaking the repair work shall not change the structural design of the building or make any addition or alteration in the building.

Accordingly, WPA 19855 of 2023 is disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the learned advocates for the parties on usual undertakings.

(Kausik Chanda, J.)