Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Agra

Ashok Kumar Varshney, Agra vs Department Of Income Tax on 20 March, 2013

              IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
                         AGRA BENCH, AGRA

     BEFORE : SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
              SHRI A.L. GEHLOT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                            ITA No. 446/Agra/2012
                             Asstt. Year : 2006-07

A.C.I.T., Central Circle,            vs.          Shri Ashok Kumar Varshney,
Agra.                                             A-2, Prem Nagar Colony,
                                                  Hathras.
                                                  (PAN : AAQPV 0860 K)
(Appellant)                                       (Respondent)

      Appellant by             :     Shri Waseem Arshad, Sr. D.R.
      Respondent by            :     Shri Navin Gargh, Advocate

      Date of hearing                       :      20.03.2013
      Date of pronouncement of order        :      20.03.2012

                                    ORDER
Per Bhavnesh Saini, J.M.:

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)-I, Agra dated 26.03.2012 for the assessment year 2006-07.

2. The Revenue in the present appeal raised four grounds of appeal, challenging the deletion of various additions on merits total amounting to Rs.9,18,227/-, on which the tax effect is below Rs.3,00,000/- According to the CBDT Instruction No. 03/2011 dated 09.02.2011, it is provided that the departmental appeal would not be filed before the Tribunal if the tax effect would 2 ITA No. 446/Agra/2012 not exceed Rs.3,00,000/-. The present departmental appeal is filed on 01.10.2012 and thus filed in contravention of above CBDT Circular. The ld. DR did not dispute the tax below Rs.3,00,000/- in the present department appeal. No substantial question of law or any audit objection has been raised. No exceptional circumstances have been explained to establish that Board's Circular is not applicable. Therefore, the department appeal once decided on merits cannot be maintainable having the lesser tax effect involved in the departmental appeal.

3. In the result, the departmental appeal is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court.

            Sd/-                                             Sd/-
      (A.L. GEHLOT)                                 (BHAVNESH SAINI)
      Accountant Member                               Judicial Member

*aks/-

Copy of the order forwarded to :
  1.     Appellant
  2.     Respondent
  3.     CIT(A), concerned                                   By order
  4.     CIT, concerned
  5.     DR, ITAT, Agra
  6.     Guard file                                          Sr. Private Secretary

                                       True copy