Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 19]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Smt. Keshar Bai vs Dharam Das on 6 January, 2017

                              COMMON CONDITIONAL ORDER
                    IN MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS. 1055 TO 1057
                              ON THE BOARD DATED 6.1.2017
                         DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE OF COURT ORDER
6.1.2017
                    The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to
           obviate passing of identical conditional order in these matters
           involving similar office objection/default.

                    In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection
           within the prescribed time as per the Rules, the concerned matter was
           placed before the Registrar in the first instance. The Registrar
           granted sufficient time to the petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) to
           cure the defect/office objection, however, due to non-removal of office
           objection/default within the prescribed time, the concerned matter
           was required to be once again listed before the Court. The Court
           granted further time, by passing common order on the earlier
           occasion.

                    In spite of repeated opportunity (three times-one under Rules,
           second by the Registrar and third by Court), the petitioner(s)/
           applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed to cure the office objection/default.
           As a result, by way of indulgence and last opportunity, in terms of this
           order,     SIX    WEEKS'     further      time   is      granted    to   the
           petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/ appellant(s) in the respective matters to
           remove office objection/default and make the matter ready for further
           hearing      within   that   time,     failing   which     the     concerned
           petition/application/appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution
           without further reference to the Court.

                    Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/default
           is about non-service of any of the respondent, on expiry of the

extended period, the concerned matter will stand dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent(s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent(s).

In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this or der, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter:

S.No. Cases as per Cause List No. Returnable Date 1 1001 to 1020 09/05/17 1 1021 to 1040 11/05/17 1 1041 to 1054 12/05/17 1 1055 to 1057 21/02/17 ` (J.K.Maheshwari) Judge