Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Suresh Chandra vs M.P. State Agriculture Marketing Board on 19 December, 2016

                    Writ Petition No. 7776 of 2016
      19/12/2016
           Shri Vashishtha Inani, learned Counsel for the
      petitioner.
           Shri     Pankaj   Porwal,   learned    Counsel   for   the
      respondent Nos. 1 and 2, on advance notice.

Heard on the question of admission. Issue notice.

Shri Pankaj Porwal, learned Counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2, and therefore, no notice is required to them.

Let notice to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 be issued on payment of process fee within a week, returnable within six weeks.

In the meanwhile, respondents are restrained from taking coercive action in pursuance to the impugned order dated 31.8.2016.

List along with W.P. No.6468/2016 for analogous hearing.

C. c. as per rules.

(P.K. Jaiswal) Judge pp/