Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 5]

Chattisgarh High Court

Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Sumit Daga 25 Taxc/4/2019 Deputy ... on 4 July, 2019

Bench: P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Parth Prateem Sahu

                                                   1


                                                                                       NAFR

                       HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                                        TAXC No. 127 of 2018

              Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Raipur (C.G.)


                                                                                ---- Appellant

                                               Versus

              Sumit Daga, Flate No. E-601, Palm Residency, Near Bagrecha Nursing Home,
               Katora Talab, Raipur (C.G.)

                                                                              ---- Respondent

For Appellant : Ms. Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate on behalf of Shri Amit Chaudhari, Senior Standing Counsel.

Hon'ble Shri P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Judgment on Board Per P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice 04.07.2019

1. The learned standing counsel for the Appellant/Revenue submits that while moulding the pleadings and prayers and also in framing the substantial question of law, some inadvertent omission or mistake has crept in. In the said circumstance, permission is sought for to withdraw this matter without prejudice to the rights and liberty to the Appellant/Department to file fresh proceedings, instead of causing the matter to be amended and by filing such other supplementary proceedings. Reference is also made to the similar course pursued by this Court in such other matters in the said circumstance. 2

2. Permission is granted. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty as above.

3. In view of the fact that this appeal had been preferred before this Court within the statutory time, we permit the Appellant to file appropriate proceedings as above, within a further period of one month.

4. The Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the order under challenge alongwith the service certificate.

                             Sd/-                                               Sd/-

                  (P. R. Ramachandra Menon)                            (Parth Prateem Sahu)
                        Chief Justice                                        Judge
Brijmohan