Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Urc Construction (P) Ltd on 23 November, 2017

Author: A.S.Bopanna

Bench: A.S.Bopanna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

     DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2017

                          BEFORE

       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.BOPANNA

      WRIT PETITION NO.42674/2016(GM-Res)

BETWEEN :

Bangalore Metro Rail
Corporation Ltd.,
A Company registered under
The provisions of the
Companies Act, 1956,
Having its registered office at
3rd Floor, BMTC building,
K.H.Road, Shanthinagar,
Bangalore - 560 008.
Represented by its
Chief Engineer,
Shri N.P.Sharma.                      ...PETITIONER

       (By Sri.S.Sriranga, Adv. for
           M/s.Just Law, Advs.)

AND :

1.     URC Construction (P) Ltd.,
       A company registered
       under the Provisions of
       The Companies Act, 1956
       Having its registered office
       At H-102, Periyar Nagar,
       Erode - 638 001,
                           -2-


     Represented by its
     Managing Director
     Shri S.Palanisamy.

2.   Shri B.R.Sudhakar,
     Presiding Arbitrator,
     No.888, 20th Main,
     4th 'T' Block, Jayanagar,
     Bengaluru - 560 041.

3.   Shri G.C.Tallu,
     Co-Arbitrator,
     'Sushanty', No.90,
     2nd Main, 11th Cross,
     Nirmal Nagar,
     Dharwad - 580 003.

4.   Shri M.Ravindra,
     Co-Arbitrator,
     1B, PGP Manor,
     No.29, Barnaby Road,
     Kilpauk,
     Chennai - 600 010.             ...RESPONDENTS

     (By Sri.Pradeep S.Sawkar, Adv. for C/R1)
                       . . . .

     This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and
227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the
communication dated 30.07.2016 issued by the
respondent No.2 on behalf of the Arbitral Tribunal vide
Annexure 'J'.

      This writ petition coming on for preliminary
hearing, this day, the Court made the following:
                          -3-



                     ORDER

Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a Memo dated 23.11.2017.

2. In terms of the memo, petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Sd/-

JUDGE SPS