Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Thangaraj S/O Sarvesh Naidu vs M/S National Insurance Co Ltd on 20 March, 2008

HIGH covnw LEGAL szavxcas comwwza, a§Né§;bgz
BEFORE THE LOK AnALAT,¢;"*'* " "
IN THE HIGH couaw av xaxmaxaxa gm §$EéA;$§EL '
aAmEn wnxs was 29" flay fir fi§afi§;"é§§s 'a 

concznxarzgas éREsgNT{"*'
KGN'BLE MR.JUsTIfiE L,V 'YAfiA swam
:_. ...  'V-,2. V'-'_ H.'
SRI.K su3$ANAaAg3nA 3An, MEMBER

Miscellaneous Eirafi'3gpég15§pfi11371/zoos
_ .(Lok Adalat'He,120é!2007)

aawwEEn:7»_5i¢:"

sax mfiaxaakafi ".,", --
5/o saavnsn Raina _*e*
19 ¥aARs*V " =.'>
C/QvDORk£  ._ V

Kin BABURAJ HOUSE

._ v§§;;3maCROSS"€fiO£ARAPAL!A
,'aMRfi3D3.3°3°
sjsaaaaxofisjsso 023 APPELLANT

" (3r $g:;3 B somnpun, ABV.,)

~x"'1_M7é NAT$ONA£ xusunascz co LTD.
=.Bz'xws Manasxn

NO.9 &IN&ARAJU CMPLEX

F GARDHI BAZAR Marx RQAB

BAHGALORE 560 004

2. sax saavanaaaa G A
5/0 aannss s

32, :3? MAIN

IST STAGE



Eu-3

{}KAI:IP'UR.AM
BANGAEORE 560 021 RESPONDENTS

(BY SR1 AN KRISHRA SVQMY, AEV. , FOR R-1) MEA FILED v/5.173 (1) or MV Acm gsainém man aunezmnnm Ann AWARE DATED:28--4-2006 P§SSE5flEfi&MVC HO.5462/2005 on THE FILE or EHE X A99: sc§'MEm£ER, MAST, METROPOLITAN AREA, BAnsALoaaf.(s¢¢H-ray, 2 PARELY ALLOWING mug ;czA1M ; Pgrzmzoxfiy Eon; comsuswxon AND sagging _rjENnAxcEMmNm_w,_oF COMPENS~.A'I.'ION .

was APFEAL CENG fin FOR comcxzxnrxcn BEFORE Lox ADALAT AFTER BEING RmrERazn'?Ib£'oRpER BAEEB:

28--2--200?, was gonncwxue acwncxnxhrzpx 'ORDER IS pAssaa'r'~"' rf5r"céN¢iz:Am:oN oanaa TR:Vvliéagrizgd. ;co11n.se31 for the cJ.aimaz1t- agfiiéllant '- :the learned counsel for the '».1«féztib§:§;a3.A"«--.Iz:surance Cormany Ltd. , along with :Lt.-.5 _ "§:_e_pre§ent;§'tive are present. '2.f~AAfter prolonged negcstiations, the matter AA is ..s£-iztled. The apgellant-claimant has agreed. ta * .réceive and the Reapondez:t- Insurance Company has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.55,G00/- (Rupees Fifty- five Thousand only) , in addition 'he what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in fall afiéffiinal settlement of the claim. A.§oint'fl§dfi§lfil§al on behalf of the partiea ta this_@ffe§t§lV *t
3. The Responde$t*,f Vlfifitrapétitfiampatyl htb agreed. to deposit -:.:;i.c11_» fiefora the Tribunal withifityiixfi W@¢£SttfrGm the date ofi preparation_ of aw$:d;l $fiillt§@ffihich the said ameunt sfiélgl caixyfl lntéréit" at the rate of 9% P.AL"frajtfié"dét¢'ofl3éf§ult, till the date of dep5§it,V
--.u4. afhisllmiscéllaneous first appeal stands "*. A"dia§bsédl of vifit terms of the Jbint memo. he 'V the 'rriibunal stands modified A§t¢ardl#gly. Registry to draw up the Award t,' aceprdingly.

Sd/~ Judge