Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Hanumanth Devar Trust Committee vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 January, 2022

Author: B.M. Shyam Prasad

Bench: B.M. Shyam Prasad

                         1




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                  DHARWAD BENCH

      DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022

                      BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M. SHYAM PRASAD

       WRIT PETITION NO.103739/2021 (GM-R/C)

BETWEEN

       SRI. HANUMANTH DEVAR TRUST
       COMMITTEE, KADUR
       TQ. RATTIHALLI-581116
       DIST.HAVERI
       BY ITS MEMBERS

1.     KAREGOUDA S/O. HANUMANTAPPAGOUDA
       KUDUPALI, AGE. 65 YEARS,
       OCC. AGRICULTURE AND MEMBER HANUMANTH
       DEVAR TEMPLE TRUST COMMITTE KADUR
       TQ. RATTIHALLI,
       DIST. HAVERI-581116

2.     UJJANAGOUDA S/O. LAKKANAGOUDA
       LAKKANAGOUDAR, AGE. 52 YEARS,
       OCC. AGRICULTURE AND MEMBER HANUMANTH
       DEVAR TEMPLE TRUST COMMITTE KADUR
       TQ. RATTIHALLI,
       DIST. HAVERI-581116

3.     RUDRAGOUDA S/O. SHIVANAGOUDA SAVAKAR
       AGE. 77 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE AND MEMBER
       HANUMANTH DEVAR TEMPLE TRUST COMMITTE
       KADUR, TQ. RATTIHALLI,
       DIST. HAVERI-581116

4.     BASANAGOUDA S/O. HANUMANTAGOUDA
                          2




     MULIMANI, AGE. 55 YEARS,
     OCC. AGRICULTURE AND MEMBER HANUMANTH
     DEVAR TEMPLE TRUST COMMITTE KADUR
     TQ. RATTIHALLI,
     DIST. HAVERI-581116
                                  ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.S.G.KADADAKATTI, ADV.)

AND

1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
      DEPT. OF HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE
      ENDOWMENTS,
      M.S.BUILDING
      DR.AMBEDAKR VEEDHI
      BENGALURU-560001
      BY ITS SECRETARY

2.    THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/ADDITIONAL DC
      HAVERI, DIST. HAVERI-581110

3.    THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HAVERI
      SUB-DIVISION, DIST. HAVERI-581110

4.    THE TAHASILDAR RATTIHALLI
      DIST. HAVERI-581116
                                    ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.V.S.KALASURMATH, HCGP)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 12.06.2019 BEARING NO.MUJARAI.
VAHI.277.   2016-17   ISSUED     BY  THE    DEPUTY
COMMISSIONER HAVERI, VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC.

    THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                3




                          ORDER

The petitioners' have impugned the initiation of proceedings under Section 25 of the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 for constitution of Committee of Management and the publication issued by the fourth respondent inviting objections as regards the constitution of such Committee of Management. The impugned publication is dated 12.06.2019 (Annexure - D) and the notice is dated 19.08.2021 (Annexure - J).

Sri.S.G.Kadadakatti, the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the process is commenced for constitution of the Committee of Management because the Hon'ble Supreme Court had stayed the decision of the Division Bench of this Court quashing Act No.2/2012 including provisions of Section 25. However, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has vacated the interim order insofar as Section 25 and consequentially the 4 Division Bench's judgment quashing the Act insofar as Section 25 is revived.

Sri.V.S.Kalasurmath, learned HCGP when queried, submits that as of today, the fourth respondent viz., the jurisdictional Tahasildar has only filed a report and that is being considered by the jurisdictional Deputy Commissioner (the second respondent) but no decision is taken to constitute the Committee of Management. When queried further on the jurisdiction to initiate and continue the proceedings for constitution of the said Committee of Management in view of the interim order granted being vacated by the Apex Court, the learned HCGP submits that he has instructions to place on record that no further action would be taken pursuant to the impugned publication/annexure until there is appropriate orders by the Hon'ble Apex Court in that regard.

5

This submission is placed on record and the petition stands disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE Rsh