Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Echjay Industries Pvt. Ltd. And 7 Ors vs Rajendra And 2 Ors on 22 July, 2019

Bench: Akil Kureshi, S.J. Kathawalla

Sherla V.


                                                                               nmw.481.2016_1.doc


                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        O.O.C.J.

                                 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.481 OF 2016
                                                IN
                                   WRIT PETITION NO.122 OF 2009

            Echjay industries Private Ltd. & Ors.                            ... Applicants

            IN THE MATTER OF:
            Echjay industries Private Ltd. & Ors.                              ... Petitioners
                          Vs
            Director of Income Tax (Investigation) - II & Ors. ... Respondents


            Mr.Percy Pardiwalla with Vishesh Malviya, Bhavin Shah i/b
            Rashmikant & Partners for Applicants/Petitioners

            Mr.P.C. Chhotaray for Respondents

                                                CORAM: AKIL KURESHI &
                                                       S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ.

DATED: JULY 22, 2019 P.C.:

1. This Motion is taken out by the petitioners. The request made is for releasing the seized assets in the nature of jewellery.

After some discussion across the bar, the learned Counsel for the petitioners stated, on instructions, that the petitioners would even be willing to provide bank guarantee of a matching sum of the current value of the seized assets (jewellery) on which condition the jewellery may be released.

Page 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 24/07/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 24/07/2019 22:19:45 :::

nmw.481.2016_1.doc

2. At the first instance, keeping all objections of the respondents to this prayer, we would require the current valuation of the assets in question to be brought on record. For such purpose, we request the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central - 4 to appoint a Departmental Valuer for such purpose, which may done in consultation with the petitioners. Such valuer may present the current valuation of the assets in question before the next date of hearing.

3. S.O. to 13.8.2019. It is clarified that the petitioners shall bear the cost of obtaining such valuation report.

(S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.) Page 2 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 24/07/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 24/07/2019 22:19:45 :::