Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad

Jugnu Kumar vs Controller General Of Decence Accounts on 25 November, 2025

                                                                                      Open Court
                                     CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
                                               ALLAHABAD BENCH
                                                   ALLAHABAD
                    Allahabad this, the 25th day of November, 2025
                    Original Application No.165 of 2017
                    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (J)
                    Hon'ble Mr. Anjani Nandan Sharan, Member (A)

                    Jugnu Kumar, a/a 41 years, S/o late Laxmi Prasad, R/o Plot No.16,
                    Block-1 A, Lakhanpur, District Kanpur 208084 (U.P.)
                                                                     ............. Applicant

                    By Advocate: Shri Shyamal Narain

                                                       Versus

PUNIT KUMAR
  MISHRA
                    Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Government of
                    India New Delhi & 5 Ors.
                                                                           ... Respondents

                    By Advocate: Shri Rajni Kant Rai
                                                 ORDER

By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (J.):-

Heard Shri Shyamal Narain, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajni Kant Rai, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that by the efflux of time, instant Original Application has become infructuous as the applicant has been granted the relief as claimed in Original Application. Therefore, he seeks permissions to withdraw the instant original application.

3. The applicant, who appears in Court admit that the grievances have already been redressed.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents does not object the same.

5. Accordingly, instant original application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

6. Pending M.A., if any, will be treated as disposed of.




                    (Anjani Nandan Sharan)                           (Justice Rajiv Joshi)
                       Member (A)                                         Member (J)
              PM/



                                                                                        Page 1 of 1