Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

N.Balakrishnan vs I.Geetha on 28 January, 2014

Author: Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan

Bench: Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                                         PRESENT:

             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
                                                                 &
                         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS

                  MONDAY,THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/25TH JYAISHTA, 1937

                                               RFA.No. 304 of 2014 ()
                                                    -----------------------
      AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 685/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE
                            ADDL.SUB COURT,KOLLAM DATED 28-01-2014
                                   ...............................................................


APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF :
---------------------------------


                     N.BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 76 YEARS
                     PARANKIMAMILA VEEDU, NEDUNGOLAM, PARAVOOR
                     KOLLAM.


                     BY ADVS.SRI.C.RAJENDRAN
                                  SRI.K.R.RANJITH




RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT :
---------------------------------------




                     I.GEETHA
                     W/O. SURENDRAN, LANADALE, UTHRADAM VEEDU,
                     KOTTAPURAM, PARAVOOR, KOLLAM-691 301.


                     BY ADV. SRI.AJAYA KUMAR. G




                     THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
                     15-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
                     FOLLOWING:




AMV



                THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

                                       &

                           SUNIL THOMAS, JJ.

                ..................................................

                        R.F.A.No.304 of 2014

                ...................................................

              Dated this the 15th day of June, 2015

                                 JUDGMENT

Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.

The learned counsel for the appellant states that this appeal may be dismissed for non-prosecution since the matter has been settled out of court. Balance court fee not paid. Appeal rejected. Refund the court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal at its institution, to the appellant through his learned counsel. Appeal ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

(THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) sd/-

(SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE) AMV/15/06/ /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE