Gauhati High Court
M/S Goswami Engineering vs The Union Of India And 6 Ors on 28 August, 2025
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010080142023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2061/2023
M/S GOSWAMI ENGINEERING
HAVING THEIR OFFICE AT NH-37(A), BATAMARI,
P.O.- KALIABHOMORA,
TEZPUR, ASSAM- 784027,
DULY REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI DIGANTA GOSWAMI,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
SON OF LATE BARADA KANTA GOSWAMI,
RESIDENT OF POLOFIELD BAMUNGAON, P.O. AND P.S.-TEZPUR- 784001,
ASSAM.
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE DEFENCE SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY,
TRANSPORT BHAWAN-1,
PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI- 110001.
2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION LTD. (NHIDCL)
MINISTRY OF ROAD
TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS
3RD FLOOR
PTI BUILDING
4-PARLIAMENT STREET
NEW DELHI- 110001.
3:THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (P)
Page No.# 2/4
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION LIMITED (NHIDCL)
REGIONAL OFFICE- GUWAHATI
MINISTRY OF ROAD
TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS
2ND FLOOR
AGNISHANTI BUSINESS PARK
OPP. AGP OFFICE
GNB ROAD
AMBARI
GUWAHATI- 781001
ASSAM.
4:THE GENERAL MANAGER (PROJECT)
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION LIMITED
PROJECT MONITORING UNIT- TEZPUR
SARAF TOWER
1ST FLOOR
OPPOSITE DON BOSCO SCHOOL
MAZGAON
TEZPUR- 784001
ASSAM.
5:STUP CONSTULTANTS PVT. LTD.
PS SRIJAN TECH PARK
8TH FLOOR
PLOT NO. DN-52
BLOCK-DN
ELECTRONIC COMPLEX
SALT LAKE CITY
SECTOR-V
KOLKATA- 700091.
6:M/S. RAMKY-TK(JV)
RAMK GRANDIOSE
19TH FLOOR
Page No.# 3/4
SY. NO. 136/2 AND 4
GACHIBOWLI
HYDERABAD- 500032
TELENGANA.
7:M/S. T K ENGINEERING CONSORTIUM (P) LTD.
MODEL VILLAGE- NAHARLAGUN
DISTRICT- PAPUM PARE
ARUNACHAL PRADESH- 791110
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D BORAH, MS. P RABIDAS
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, NHIDC, MR J LIKHA (r-6,7),MS. SOMILA(r-6,7),MR. S K
DEORI(r-6,7)
Page No.# 4/4
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
ORDER
Date : 28.08.2025 Heard Mr. D. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. K. Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel, NHIDCL, appearing for the respondent nos.1, 2, 3 & 4 as well as Mr. S. K. Deori, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent nos.6 & 7.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, in terms of the undertaking given by the respondent nos.6 & 7 before the NHIDCL authorities, the bills submitted for utility shifting by it, can be released directly to the petitioner by the NHIDCL.
Mr. R. K. Talukdar and Mr. S.K. Deori, learned counsels, appearing for the respondents submit that they be given a week's time to complete their instructions in this matter.
Prayer accepted.
Registry to list this matter again on 11.09.2025.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant