Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

M/S Pasco Automobiles Through Its ... vs Union Of India And Others on 25 July, 2023

Author: Ritu Bahri

Bench: Ritu Bahri

                                             Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:094092-DB




                                                   2023:PHHC:094092-DB

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                  CHANDIGARH

220                                      CWP-33824-2019 (O&M)
                                      Date of decision:-54.07.2023


M/S PASCO AUTOMOBILES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR
SANJAY PASSI
                                     .... Petitioner
                   Vs


UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


                                                          ...Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
      HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Present: Mr. J.K. Mittal, Advocate,
         Mr. Arjun Kundra, Advocate and
         Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

          Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate with
          Ms. Sidhi Bansal, Advocate and
          Ms. Ridhi Bansal, Advocate for the respondents.


Ritu Bahri, J. (Oral)

In the present petition, the petitioner does not press his prayer to challenge the vires of Rule 5A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. He restricted his prayer to quashing of the impugned letter/notice dated 24.09.2018 and 27.03.2019, Annexures P-1 and P-3 respectively as well as the impugned summons dated 06.11.2019, Annexure P-7.

The impugned notices, Annexures P-1 and P-3 have been issued under Rule 5-A of Service Tax Rules, 1994 and the information from the petitioner has been sought by giving documents of service 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 29-07-2023 21:47:21 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:094092-DB 2023:PHHC:094092-DB -2- tax audit with respect to the period 2013-2014 to June, 2017. As per Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994, the entire proceedings of recovery of service tax are to be completed within a maximum period of 5 years. Relevant extract of Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994 is reproduced as under:-

"SECTION 73. Recovery of service tax not levied or paid or short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded. --
(1) Where any service tax has not been levied or paid or has been short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded, Central Excise Officer may, within thirty months from the relevant date, serve notice on the person chargeable with the service tax which has not been levied or paid or which has been short-levied or short-paid or the person to whom such tax refund has erroneously been made, requiring him to show cause why he should not pay the amount specified in the notice : Provided that where any service tax has not been levied or paid or has been short-levied or short- paid or erroneously refunded by reason of --
(a) fraud; or
(b) collusion; or
(c) wilful mis-statement; or
(d) suppression of facts; or
(e) contravention of any of the provisions of this Chapter or of the rules made thereunder with intent to evade payment of service tax, by the person chargeable with the service tax or his agent, the provisions of this sub-section shall have effect, as if, for the words "thirty months", the words "five years" had been substituted."

2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 29-07-2023 21:47:22 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:094092-DB 2023:PHHC:094092-DB -3- In the present case, the notice was issued for 2013-2014 up to June, 2017 and w.e.f. June, 2017, 5 years have come to an end in June, 2022. Hence till date the proceedings have not been finalized and as per the Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994, proceedings pursuant to the notices, Annexures P-1 and P-3 cannot be finalized by the respondents now.

Learned counsel for the respondents has further informed the Court that pursuant to the order dated 20.02.2023, the petitioner had sent letters on 16.11.2019, 27.03.2019 and 21.02.2022 to provide documents pursuant to the notices, Annexures P-1 and P-3 which he has not given till date and as per the respondents, proceedings are still pending. As per notice under Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994, the proceedings have to be concluded within 5 years.

In the present case, proceedings pursuant to the notice cannot be continued now. As such, writ petition is allowed. The letter/notice dated 24.09.2018 and 27.03.2019, Annexures P-1 and P-3 respectively are set aside.

( RITU BAHRI ) JUDGE ( MANISHA BATRA ) JUDGE 25.07.2023 pooja saini Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:094092-DB 3 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 29-07-2023 21:47:22 :::