Karnataka High Court
Satyam Computers Services Ltd vs The Additional Commissioner Of ... on 21 September, 2012
Bench: K.Sreedhar Rao, B.Manohar
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR
STA No.1/2011 (Tax)
BETWEEN :
SATYAM COMPUTERS
SERVICES LTD
SSL BUILDING,
PLOT # 22 TO 25 &
27 TO 34, HI-TECH CITY,
2ND FLOOR, BLOCK 3
MADHAPUR,
HYDERABAD-500 081. APPELLANT
( By Sri T SURYANARAYANA, ADV. FOR M/S KING &
PARTRIDGE )
AND :
THE ADDITIONAL
COMMISSIONER OF
COMMERCIAL TAXES
ZONE-II VANIJYA
THERIGE KARYALAYA,
KALIDASA ROAD,
GANDHI NAGAR,
BANGALORE ...RESPONDENT
( By Sri T K VEDAMURTHY, HCGP)
2
STA IS FILED U/S 24(1) OF THE KST ACT AGAINST THE
REVISION ORDER DATED: 20.09.2010 PASSED IN
NO.SMR/KVAT/DVO-6/CR-01/09-10 BY THE ADDL.
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ZONE-II,
BANGALORE.
This STA coming on for hearing this day, K.SREEDHAR
RAO, J, delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
The sale made by the appellant/assessee to an extent of Rs.1,82,68,842.00 was an interstate sale from Hyderabad. The CST has been accordingly paid on the said turnover. The Assessing Officer, however, held otherwise that it is not interstate sale, but it is sale in Karnataka. Hence, the Assessing Officer levied the tax at 10% with interest and penalty. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals) granted the relief and allowed the appeal holding that the sale made by the assessee is an interstate sale from Hyderabad. The Additional Commissioner while exercising the revisional power held that it is a local sale and levied the tax at 4%. The assessee made an application vide Annexure-O before the Additional Commissioner of 3 Commercial Taxes submitting that since the sale having been held as local sale, the CST paid on the said turn over should be refunded and in respect of the levy of local tax of Rs.7,30,794.00, it was requested that the said amount to be adjusted towards the amount which the assessee is entitled to pay towards CST. The Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes without addressing to the question raised in the request has held that it is interestate sale and the assessee has not placed any credible materials to substantiate the same. The photocopy certificate issued by the Chartered Accountant is not authenticated document to substantiate that it is interstate sale. Hence, he rejected the application in fact revision.
2. The assessee accepted the revisional order holding that it is a local sale and prepared to pay the tax. The request for refund of the tax paid towards CST has not been considered by the Additional Commissioner of Commercial 4 Taxes. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted to the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.
Sd/-
JUDGE Sd/-
JUDGE bkm.