Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Partner: Shalabh Jalan vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 12 November, 2013

Author: Harish Tandon

Bench: Harish Tandon

                                            1



Court   12.11.13                       W.P. 32593 (W) of 2013
No.
22
Sl 12
Ac
                                                            Sarvoshree Iron Works
                                                            Partner: Shalabh Jalan
                                                                     -vs-
                                                           State of West Bengal & Ors


                   Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee                    ... For Petitioner

                   Mr. Soumitra Mukherjee                     ... For Advocate General



                                  The petitioner has sought for declaration that the
                   provisions of the West Bengal Tax on Entry of Goods Into Local
                   Areas Act, 2012 and the Rules made thereunder are ultra vires
                   and be declared as null and void.        In one of the writ petitions,
                   being W.P. 11407 (W) of 2012, the vires of the provisions of the
                   said Act was also challenged and by a judgment dated 24.06.2013
                   the Hon'ble Single Bench declared the provisions of the said Act as
                   ultra vires.
                                  The State respondents, who are represented, submit

that the said judgment is carried in an appeal before the Division Bench in M.A.T. 1107 of 2013 and the Hon'ble Division Bench has directed the matter to be listed in the first week of January 2014 and by way of interim measure, directed the authorities to proceed with the assessment proceeding and they are not liable to refund the entry tax, already collected.

This Court finds that the mater is sub-judice before the Division Bench and the decision that would be taken therein would have impact on the determination, which is required to be made in this writ petition.

Accordingly, the writ petition is adjourned sine die till disposal of the matter pending before the Hon'ble Division Bench.

The parties are at liberty to pray for inclusion of this matter upon disposal of the appeal or if any order be passed by the Division Bench which does not put any impediment in deciding the instant writ petition.

(Harish Tandon, J.)