Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

P.R.Purushothaman Nair vs Kerala State Road Transport on 12 December, 2008

Author: S.Siri Jagan

Bench: S.Siri Jagan

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 34802 of 2008(R)


1. P.R.PURUSHOTHAMAN NAIR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT
                       ...       Respondent

2. DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :12/12/2008

 O R D E R
                             S. Siri Jagan, J.
               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                      W. P (C) No. 34802 of 2008
               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
               Dated this, the 12th December, 2008.

                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioner retired from the service of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation as a Conductor on 31-5-2004. At the time of retirement, his retirement benefits were fixed without reckoning the prior Government service of the petitioner. The petitioner filed W.P (C) No. 19510/2007 in which the 1st respondent was directed to consider and pass orders on the representation filed by the petitioner in that regard. After considering the petitioner's representation, the Corporation decided to reckon the petitioner's prior Government service also for the purpose of retirement benefits. Accordingly, the pensionary benefits of the petitioner has been revised and revised pension order, Ext. P1, has been passed. The petitioner's grievance in this writ petition is that the arrears as per Ext. P1 have not been paid to the petitioner yet.

2. I have heard the learned standing counsel for the Corporation also. He could not dispute the entitlement of the petitioner for payment of arrears as per Ext. P1. He only seeks time.

In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to pay to the petitioner all arrears pursuant to Ext. P1, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.

Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.