Delhi High Court - Orders
Chiest Farmceutici S.P.A vs Cipla Limited on 10 July, 2020
Author: Prateek Jalan
Bench: Prateek Jalan
$~1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
I.A. 5202/2020 & I.A. 5203/2020
+ C.S.(COMM) 592/2019
CHIEST FARMCEUTICI S.P.A. Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms.Vaishali
Mittal & Mr. Rohin Koolwal,
Advocates.
versus
CIPLA LIMITED Defendant
Through: Mr. Tahir A.J., Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
ORDER
% 10.07.2020 I.A. 4418/2020(Application by the defendant for filing documents in sealed cover) in C.S.(COMM) 592/20219
1. This application has been listed before me in view of the order of the Roster Bench dated 19.06.2020.
2. A request for adjournment has been made on behalf of the defendant/applicant on the ground that Ms. Rajeshwari, learned counsel for the defendant is indisposed. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has no objection to the adjournment.
3. List on 31.07.2020.
I.A. 14854/2019(Application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC, 1908) in C.S.(COMM) 592/2019
1. This is an application for injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 CS(COMM) 592/2019 Page 1 of 2 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed by the plaintiff. Although it is not listed today, it is taken up with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.
2. Mr. Pravin Anand, learned counsel for the plaintiff had made his submissions on this application on 05.02.2020. However, in view of the restricted functioning of the Court, the application was not heard on the scheduled date and has not been taken up thereafter. The arguments of learned counsel for the defendant are yet to be heard. In the meanwhile, the roster has also been amended and I am now sitting in Division Bench- I with Hon'ble the Chief Justice.
3. In these circumstances, it is made clear, with the consent of learned counsel on both sides, that the application is not to be treated as part heard.
4. List on the scheduled date before the Roster Bench.
PRATEEK JALAN, J JULY 10, 2020 'pv' CS(COMM) 592/2019 Page 2 of 2