Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Gaya Prasad Gupta vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 15 July, 2017

                     CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                     2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August KrantiBhawan,
                       BhikajiCama Place, New Delhi -110066
                                Tel : +91-11-26186535

                                         Appeal No.CIC/BS/A/2016/001724

Appellant:               Gaya Prasad Gupta,
                         Plot No.-906/S-1,
                         Opposite Police Chauki,
                         Shalimar Garden Extension 1,
                         Ghaziabad-201005
                         (9452222880)

Respondent:              Central Public Information Officer
                         GM BSNL,
                         O/o GMTD Mall Road,
                         Kanpur
                         Uttar Pradesh.

Date of Hearing:         13.07.2017

Dated of Decision:       13.07.2017

                         ORDER

Facts:

1. The appellant filed RTI application dated 11.01.2016 seeking a copy of the letter issued by the corporate office regarding charging of the installation fee of Rs. 750/- and the instrument clip charges of Rs. 300/- from the retired BSNL officials; along with details regarding disposal of his protest application dated 20.07.2015.
2. The CPIO response is not on record. The appellant filed first appeal dated 15.03.2016. The FAA responded on 08.04.2016. The appellant filed second appeal on 17.06.2016 before the Commission on the ground that information should be provided to him.
Hearing:
3. The appellant did not participate in the hearing. The respondent participated in the hearing through video conferencing.
1
4. The respondent stated that they have provided the sought for information to the appellant on 12.02.2016. Further, they have furnished a reply to the appellant on 10.07.2017 regarding the information on installation/clip charges. The reply given was read out and was found to be satisfactory.
Discussion/ observation:
5. The action/steps taken by the respondent in giving information in response to the RTI application is satisfactory. Decision:
6. No further intervention of the Commission is required in the matter.

The appeal is disposed of. Copy of the order be given to the parties free of cost.

(Radha Krishna Mathur) Chief Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy (S.C. Sharma) Dy. Registrar 2